Integrated Optical Modulator

ABSTRACT

Systems and methods for manipulating light with high index contrast waveguides clad with crystalline substances having that exhibit large nonlinear electro-optic constants χ 2  and χ 3 . Waveguides fabricated on SOI wafers and clad with crystalline materials such as barium titanate are described. Embodiments of waveguides having slots, electrical contacts, and input waveguide couplers are discussed. Waveguides having closed loop structures (such as rings and ovals) as well as linear or serpentine waveguides, are described. Optical signal processing methods, such as optical rectification and optical modulation, are disclosed.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to and the benefit of co-pending U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/958,210, filed Jul. 2, 2007, and is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/678,992, filed Feb. 26, 2007, which application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/477,207, filed Jun. 28, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,200,308, through which the priority to and the benefit of Ser. No. 60/694,765, filed Jun. 28, 2005 is also claimed, each of which applications is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY FUNDED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

The U.S. Government has certain rights in this invention pursuant to Grant No. N00014-06-1-0859 awarded by the Office of Naval Research.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to optical waveguides in general and particularly to optical waveguides, including split waveguides, that employ materials, such as crystalline materials such as barium titanate, lithium niobate, or polymers, having large nonlinear optical characteristics.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The field of nonlinear optics is extremely rich in results, and has been around for many years. Basically the premise of nearly all measurements in the field is that one introduces a sufficiently high power flux (or “fluence,” a term of art) in an optical material, it is often possible to excite nonlinear behavior, meaning that the properties of the material change with the input optical power. This kind of effect is very often described through the use of, for instance. Chi² (χ²) and Chi³ (χ³) which are material dependent constants that describe the strength of two of the relevant nonlinear optical activities of a material. Some nonlinearities, which are material dependent, will work at the full optical frequency, while others are slower. Recently, engineered organic materials have begun to be used for nonlinear optics, because they can be designed to have extremely large χ² and χ³ moments.

There is a need for systems and methods that can fully exploit the optical properties of materials that exhibit large χ² and χ³ moments without having to provide excessive amounts of optical power to do so.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one aspect, the invention relates to an apparatus for manipulating light. The apparatus comprises a substrate having an insulating surface; a high index contrast waveguide adjacent the insulating surface; a cladding adjacent the high index contrast waveguide, the cladding comprising a crystalline material that exhibits an enhanced nonlinear optical coefficient; an input port through which an input optical signal is admitted into the apparatus; and an output port from which an output optical signal is provided by the apparatus. The high index contrast waveguide and the cladding are configured so that an electric field intensity of at least 10⁵ V/m is generated in a selected one of the high index contrast waveguide and the cladding in response to an input voltage of not more than 1 volt across the high index contrast waveguide.

In one embodiment, the substrate is a silicon wafer. In one embodiment, the insulating surface is a layer comprising silicon and oxygen. In one embodiment, the high index contrast waveguide adjacent the insulating surface is silicon. In one embodiment, the high index contrast waveguide is a slotted waveguide. In one embodiment, the high index contrast waveguide is configured in a closed loop. In one embodiment, the high index contrast waveguide is configured as a resonator structure.

In one embodiment, the apparatus for manipulating light further comprises an input waveguide for coupling optical radiation into the high index contrast waveguide. In one embodiment, the apparatus for manipulating light further comprises at least one electrical connector for making electrical connection to the high index contrast waveguide.

In another aspect, the invention features a method of optically processing light. The method comprises the steps of providing a structure comprising a substrate having an insulating surface, a high index contrast waveguide adjacent the insulating surface, a cladding adjacent the high index contrast waveguide, the cladding comprising a crystalline material that exhibits an enhanced nonlinear optical coefficient, an input port through which an input optical signal is admitted into the apparatus, and an output port from which an output optical signal is provided by the apparatus, in which the high index contrast waveguide and the cladding configured so that an electric field intensity of at least 10⁵ V/m is generated in a selected one of the high index contrast waveguide and the cladding in response to an input of not more than 1 volt across the high index contrast waveguide. The method also includes the steps of impressing onto the structure an input optical signal to be processed, the input optical signal having at least one parameter characterizing the input optical signal; and observing an output signal, the output signal having at least one parameter that is different from the at least one parameter characterizing the input optical signal.

In one embodiment, the step of impressing as an input optical signal to be processed includes providing the input optical signal with an input waveguide that communicates with the high index contrast waveguide with a coupler. In one embodiment, the step of providing the structure comprises providing a slotted high index contrast waveguide. In one embodiment, the step of providing the structure comprises providing a high index contrast waveguide having at least one electrode for applying an electrical signal to the high index contrast waveguide.

In one embodiment, the method of optically processing light further comprises the step of applying an electrical signal to the high index contrast waveguide. In one embodiment, the step of applying an electrical signal to the high index contrast waveguide comprises applying a signal to pole a cladding material.

In one embodiment, the output signal having at least one parameter that is different from the at least one parameter characterizing the input optical signal comprises an output optical signal having at least one of one of an intensity, a polarization, a frequency, a wavelength, and a duration that differs from at least one of an intensity, a polarization, a frequency, a wavelength, and a duration of the input optical signal. In one embodiment, the output signal has a DC component that is different from the at least one parameter of the input signal. In one embodiment, the DC component of the output signal is an electrical signal.

In yet another aspect, the invention provides an apparatus for converting an electrical input signal to an optical output signal. The apparatus comprises a substrate having an insulating surface; a high index contrast waveguide adjacent the insulating surface, the high index contrast waveguide having input electrodes in electrical communication therewith; a cladding adjacent the high index contrast waveguide, the cladding comprising a crystalline material that exhibits an enhanced nonlinear optical coefficient; an input port through which an input optical signal is admitted into the apparatus; and an output port from which an output optical signal is provided by the apparatus. The high index contrast waveguide and the cladding are configured so that a phase shift of substantially p radians in the optical output signal relative to the input optical signal is generated when an electrical input signal having a magnitude measured in hundreds of millivolts is applied to the input electrodes of the apparatus.

In one embodiment, the electrical input signal is an electrical signal having a magnitude measured in tens of millivolts. In one embodiment, the millivolt-scale electrical input signal is an electrical signal having a magnitude measured in units of millivolts. In one embodiment, the substrate is a silicon wafer. In one embodiment, the insulating surface is a layer comprising silicon and oxygen. In one embodiment, the high index contrast waveguide adjacent the insulating surface is silicon. In one embodiment, the high index contrast waveguide is a slotted waveguide. In one embodiment, the high index contrast waveguide and the cladding configured so that a phase shift of substantially p radians in an optical output signal is generated when a millivolt-scale electrical input signal is applied to the input electrodes of the apparatus. In one embodiment, the millivolt-scale electrical input signal is an electrical signal having a magnitude measured in hundreds of millivolts. In one embodiment, millivolt-scale electrical input signal is an electrical signal having a magnitude measured in tens of millivolts. In one embodiment, the millivolt-scale electrical input signal is an electrical signal having a magnitude measured in units of millivolts. In one embodiment, the high index contrast waveguide is configured in a closed loop. In one embodiment, the high index contrast waveguide is configured as a resonator structure.

In one embodiment, the apparatus for converting an electrical input signal to an optical output signal further comprises an input waveguide for coupling optical radiation into the high index contrast waveguide. In one embodiment, the apparatus for converting an electrical input signal to an optical output signal further comprises at least one electrical connector for making a low loss electrical connection to the high index contrast waveguide.

The foregoing and other objects, aspects, features, and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following description and from the claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The objects and features of the invention can be better understood with reference to the drawings described below, and the claims. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead generally being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. In the drawings, like numerals are used to indicate like parts throughout the various views.

FIG. 1 is a diagram showing dispersion plots for the fundamental mode (Ex polarized) of exemplary clad and unclad waveguides, shown as effective index vs. wavelength in

FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an SEM image of an exemplary ring resonator.

FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the normalized transmission of light through the system (and past the ring) in dB, as a function of wavelength detuning in nm for both clad and unclad waveguides, shifted to overlay resonance peaks.

FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an exemplary slot waveguide mode profile.

FIG. 5 is a diagram showing the effective index vs. free space wavelength in microns for the slot waveguide of FIG. 4.

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing the device layout of an exemplary slot waveguide.

FIG. 7 is a diagram showing an SEM image of a portion of an oval slot waveguide.

FIG. 8 is a diagram showing a more detailed SEM image showing the coupling region of an exemplary slot waveguide and an input waveguide.

FIG. 9 is a diagram showing the measured transmission spectrum in dB vs. laser wavelength in nm past a high quality factor slot ring resonator.

FIG. 10 is a diagram showing the detail of the peak of the transmission spectrum near 1488 nm.

FIG. 11 is a diagram showing a shallow angle SEM view of a typical silicon-on-insulator ring resonator and waveguide having a sidewall roughness on the order of 10 nm.

FIG. 12 is a diagram of a slot ring resonator directional coupler region, and the associated input waveguide.

FIG. 13 is a diagram showing a slot waveguide structure that exhibits subfield stitching errors at the edge of an input waveguide.

FIG. 14 is a diagram showing yet another example of a rough wall that is likely to create problems in device fabrication and operation.

FIG. 15 is a diagram showing an exemplary high-index segmented waveguide structures, which in the embodiment shown comprises a central waveguide portion with fingers or ridges sticking out to the sides.

FIG. 16A is a diagram that shows a dispersion diagram of both a segmented waveguide and the normal, unsegmented waveguide, taken on a plane parallel to the substrate that on a z plane that intersects the middle of a segment.

FIG. 16B is a diagram that shows modal patterns of the Bloch mode, with contours of |E| plotted, starting at 10% of the max value and with contour increments of 10%.

FIG. 16C is a diagram that shows a plot of modal patterns over four periods of a segmented waveguide on a horizontal plane that intersects the silicon layer halfway through.

FIG. 17 is a diagram that shows an exemplary electrical isolator that was constructed and tested, and which provided both a transition from a standard to a slotted waveguide and electrical isolation between the two sides of the slot waveguide.

FIG. 18 is a diagram showing the results of a baseline measurement of an EDFA and optical test system in the absence of a test sample.

FIG. 19 is a diagram showing the results for the measurement of a first exemplary material having a large value of χ³.

FIG. 20 is a diagram showing the results for the measurement of a second exemplary material having a large value of χ³.

FIG. 21 is a diagram that shows a plot of the numerically computed conversion efficiency for the second exemplary material having a large value of χ³, in dB vs 1 watt compared to length traveled in waveguide in μm.

FIG. 22 is a diagram showing a chemical reaction useful for the synthesis of a chromophore referred to as YLD 124.

FIG. 23 is a four panel diagram that shows details of one embodiment of an optical modulator device, including the geometry of the photodetectors and filters, and including a cross section of the slotted waveguide.

Panel A of FIG. 24 shows the transmission spectrum of detector device 1, according to principles of the invention.

Panel B of FIG. 24 shows the transmission spectrum of detector device 2, according to principles of the invention.

Panel C of FIG. 24 shows several curves of current vs. power for three measurement series.

Panel D of FIG. 24 shows the output current as a function of wavelength, overlaid with the transmission spectrum.

FIG. 25 is a diagram showing the use of the structures embodying the invention as resonantly enhanced electro-optic modulators, and a result at approximately 6 MHz operating frequency.

FIG. 26 is a diagram showing a chemical formula for the chromophore referred to as JSC1.

FIG. 27 shows a diagram of a Mach-Zehnder modulator with a conventional electrode geometry in top-down view, including top contact, waveguide, and bottom contact layers.

FIG. 28 shows a top-down view of a simple conventional Mach-Zehnder polymer interferometer, showing top contact, waveguide, and bottom contact layers. Such a device is usually operated in ‘push/pull’ mode, where either opposite voltages are applied to the different arms, or where the two arms are poled in opposite directions to achieve the same effect.

FIG. 29 shows an illustrative layout of a slot-waveguide based optical modulator.

FIG. 30 shows an illustrative detailed top-down view of the optical waveguide and metal contacts of the slot-waveguide based optical modulator of FIG. 29.

FIG. 31A shows the optical mode with |E| plotted in increments of 10%, for a mode with propagating power of 1 Watt.

FIG. 31B shows a contour plot of the static electric field, with the field of view slightly enlarged.

FIG. 31C and FIG. 31D show analogous data for the most optimal slot waveguide geometry that is presently known to the inventors (corresponding to design #3 in Table 2).

FIG. 32A shows the static voltage potential field distribution due to charging the two electrodes.

FIG. 32B shows the electric field due to the potential distribution. |E| is plotted in increments of 10%.

FIG. 33 is a diagram that illustrates the dependence of susceptibility on gap size for several waveguide designs.

FIG. 34A shows a cross section of the segmented, slotted waveguide, with the |E| field plotted in increments of 10% of max value.

FIG. 34B shows a similar plot for the unsegmented waveguide.

FIG. 34C shows a horizontal cross section of the segmented, slotted waveguide in which Re(Ex) is plotted in increments of 20% of max.

FIG. 35 is a diagram that illustrates a slot waveguide design and mode in contours in |E|, according to principles of the invention.

FIG. 36 is a diagram that illustrates a dispersion relation for a slot waveguide, according to principles of the invention.

FIG. 37 is a diagram that illustrates a TM mode of a horizontal slot waveguide, according to principles of the invention.

FIG. 38 is a diagram that illustrates a dispersion relation of a horizontal slot waveguide, in which the TM0 mode is to be used, according to principles of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

High index contrast waveguides as described herein are useful to concentrate light in order to enhance nonlinear optical effects in various materials so that such effects can be employed to manipulate light (or more generally electromagnetic radiation) at low power levels, as compared to conventional systems and methods that employ nonlinear optical materials. The manipulation of electromagnetic radiation or light can be useful to provide a variety of components that perform operations on light such as rectification and logic operations in a manner analogous to the same operations which are provided using electronic devices operating on electrical signals. For example, an input a light wave to be processed is impressed onto the component. The light wave has at least one parameter characterizing the light wave, such as one of an intensity, a polarization, a frequency, a wavelength, and a duration (e.g., a pulse length, or in the case of continuous wave light, an effectively infinite duration). After the input light wave is processed (or interacts with the waveguide and the clad nonlinear optical material adjacent to the waveguide), an output signal is observed. In a circumstance where the input signal has been processed, the output signal has at least one parameter that is different from at least one parameter characterizing the input light wave, including possibly an electrical output signal when the input light wave had no electrical signal component (e.g., optical rectification). As used herein, the term “optical rectification” is intended to relate to input signals having frequencies ranging from of the order of 100s of gigahertz through terahertz, and also including IR, visible, UV, and x-ray input signals.

As described in greater detail herein, the present invention provides methods and structures that exhibit enhancement of the nonlinear effects in various electro-optical materials that is sufficient to make the nonlinear effects accessible with continuous-wave, low-power lasers. In some embodiments, pulsed lasers can be used in addition to or in place of CW lasers. As is described herein the waveguide is coated or clad with another material which provides or exhibits an enhanced nonlinear optical coefficient, such as certain kinds of organic electro-optical materials that can be specifically designed to operate in various regions of the electromagnetic spectrum. We have demonstrated that some designs of high index contrast waveguides are designed to concentrate light in the cladding. In some embodiments, the waveguide is a split waveguide. In some embodiments, the split waveguide is coated with a material which provides an enhanced nonlinear optical coefficient. In some embodiments, the waveguides of the invention, including slotted or split waveguides, can operate with a low optical index fluid as a cladding, for example, air, or with no cladding, for example, vacuum. In some embodiments, the coating or cladding can be a ferroelectric material. In some embodiments, the two sides of the split waveguide also comprise electrodes that are used for polling a χ² material introduced into the gap. As described herein, in some embodiments, the dispersion of a waveguide is engineered to enhance the optical power in the mode by slowing the propagation of the light. In some embodiments the waveguides are segmented waveguides. As discussed herein, the waveguide can provide optical field enhancement when the structure is arranged into a resonator, which in various embodiments can be either a ring resonator or a linear resonator. It is believes that appropriate claddings can comprise one or more of electro-optic materials such as barium titanate (BaTiO₃), lithium niobate (LiNbO₃) and other perovskites, other crystalline materials exhibiting non-linear coefficients, glass, semiconductor, quantum dots, saturable absorbers, quantum dots doped into an organic substance, polymers and dendrimers or other organic materials providing large χ³ coefficients, or other nonlinear optical material to provide large optical nonlinearities through field enhancement in the cladding. In some embodiments, the nonlinear material may exist solely in the slot (or gap) but not surround the waveguide elsewhere. In some embodiments, the systems and methods of the invention can be used to provide a tunable infrared source. In some embodiments, by using a low power tunable laser and a high power fixed wavelength laser as the inputs, it is possible to produce a high power coherent tunable source. The tunable source can be a widely tunable coherent source. In addition, using systems and methods of the invention, the use of an incoherent input light source can result in an incoherent tunable source. With the provision of on-chip feedback, the systems and methods of the invention can be used to provide devices that exhibit optical self-oscillation. In some embodiments, the central high index waveguide comprises an amplifying medium, such as a gallium arsenide stripe laser. In some embodiments, where the cladding material exhibits nonlinearities, the laser can be operated as a pulsed source. In some embodiments, systems and methods of the invention can be constructed to provide optical logic functionality, such as optical AND or optical flip-flops. It is believed that systems and method according to the invention can be employed to create optical NAND, OR, NOR and XOR gates, and optical latches, or optical memory. In some embodiments, the systems of the invention can further comprise pump lasers integrated onto the same chip. In some embodiments, the systems of the invention can further comprise off-chip feedback or amplification for frequency conversion or pulse generation. In some embodiments, an additional electrical signal is coupled into the structure to provide active modelocking.

We have developed a set of tools for concentrating light to a high degree by using silicon or other high index contrast waveguides, and we have fabricated devices that demonstrate some of the many applications that can be contemplated when such nonlinear materials are exploited. In particular, by utilizing split waveguides, we are able to greatly enhance the optical fields in the cladding of a tightly confined waveguide, without greatly enhancing the optical losses of the same waveguide. Combining the high field concentrations available from the split waveguides with the high nonlinear activity of nonlinear optical polymers permits the development of nonlinear optical devices operating at much lower optical input power levels than are possible with conventional free space or chip based systems. We have demonstrated four-wave mixing (which is based upon χ³), as well as optical rectification (based on χ²), in such waveguides. Using these waveguides it is possible to decrease the power levels needed to observe significant nonlinearities to the point where, by contrast with conventional nonlinear optics, it can be done with non-pulsed, continuous wave lasers.

Chi2 (χ²) and Chi3 (χ³) based optical effects can be used in particular to build on-chip optical parametric oscillator (“OPO”) systems, where two input wavelengths can be mixed together to produce sum and difference frequencies. These frequencies can be either higher or lower than the input frequencies, and can be made tunable. These effects work for frequencies from the ultraviolet and X-ray regime all the way out into the far infrared and microwave, and in fact can work down to DC in some cases, particularly with optical rectification.

The material of which the high index waveguide is made can be any material having a high index that is reasonably transparent at the wavelengths of interest. This can include but is not limited to silicon, gallium nitride, indium phosphide, indium gallium nitride, gallium phosphide, diamond, sapphire, or the various quaternary III/V and II/VI materials such as aluminum gallium arsenide phosphide. III/V denotes materials having at least one element from column III of the periodic table of elements (or an element that is stable as a positive trivalent ion) and at least one element from column V (or an element that is stable as a negative trivalent ion). Examples of III/V compounds include BN, AlP, GaAs and InP. II/VI denotes materials having at least one element from column II of the periodic table of elements (or an element that is stable as a positive divalent ion) and at least one element from column VI (or an element that is stable as a negative divalent ion). Examples of II/VI compounds include MgO, CdS, ZnSe and HgTe.

We will now present a more detailed description of the systems and methods of the invention, including successively the mechanical structure of exemplary embodiments of high index waveguides, exemplary embodiments of cladding materials having large nonlinear constants χ² and χ³ and their incorporation into devices having high index waveguides, exemplary results observed on some of the fabricated devices that are described, and some theoretical discussions about the devices and the underlying physics, as that theory is presently understood. Although the theoretical descriptions given herein are believed to be correct, the operation of the devices described and claimed herein does not depend upon the accuracy or validity of the theoretical description. That is, later theoretical developments that may explain the observed results on a basis different from the theory presented herein will not detract from the inventions described herein.

Exemplary High Index Waveguide Structures Example 1 High-Q Ring Resonators in Thin Silicon-On-Insulator

Resonators comprising high-Q microrings were fabricated from thin silicon-on-insulator (SOI) layers. Measured Q values of 45 000 were observed in these rings, which were then improved to 57 000 by adding a PMMA cladding. Various waveguide designs were calculated, and the waveguide losses were analyzed.

Microring resonator structures as laser sources and as optical filter elements for dense wavelength division multiplexing systems have been studied in the past. The silicon-on-insulator (SOI) structure described here is particularly advantageous. It has low waveguide loss. One can extrapolate an uncoupled Q value of 94 000 and a waveguide loss of 7.1 dB/cm in the unclad case, and −6.6 dB/cm in the PMMA clad case, from the respective measured Q values of 45 000 and 57 000. Although higher Q values have been obtained for optical microcavities, we believe that our geometry has the highest Q for a resonator based on a single mode silicon waveguide. It is also noteworthy that a large amount of power appears outside the core silicon waveguide, which may be important in some applications. The modes that are described herein have approximately 57% of the power outside the waveguide, as compared to 20% for a single-mode 200-nm-thick silicon waveguide, and 10% for a single-mode 300-nm-thick silicon waveguide.

In the embodiment now under discussion, wafer geometries were selected that minimize the thiclness of the SOI waveguiding layer as well as the buried oxide, but still yield low loss waveguides and bends. A number of different waveguide widths were compared by finite difference based mode solving. The geometry used in the exemplary embodiment comprises a 500-nm-wide waveguide formed in a 120-nm-thick silicon layer, atop a 1.4 μm oxide layer, which rests on a silicon handle, such as a silicon wafer as a substrate. Such a configuration supports only a single well-contained optical mode for near infrared wavelengths. The dispersion characteristics are shown in FIG. 1 for both unclad and PMMA-clad waveguides. Our interest in unclad structures stems from the ease of fabrication, as detailed in the following, as well as the flexibility an open air waveguide may provide for certain applications.

These modes were determined by using a finite difference based Hermitian eigensolver, described further herein. It is possible to calculate the loss directly from the mode pattern with an analytic method valid in the low-loss limit. The waveguide loss at 1.55 μm calculated in such a fashion is approximately −4.5 dB. This loss figure was in agreement with the extrapolated results of FDTD simulation.

Because a loss of −4 dB/cm is attributed to substrate leakage, the waveguide loss can be improved by the addition of a cladding, which tends to pull the mode upwards. This notion is supported by the measured decrease in waveguide loss upon the addition of a PMMA cladding. It can be shown that the substrate leakage loss attenuation coefficient is nearly proportional to

e ^(−2√){square root over (n ^(eff) ² ^(−n) ⁰ ² ^(k) ⁰ ^(A))}

if k₀ is the free space wave number, n_(eff) is the effective index of the mode, n_(o) is the effective index of the oxide layer, and A is the thickess of the oxide. In the present case, the e-folding depth of the above-mentioned function turns out to be 180 nm, which explains why the substrate leakage is so high.

SOI material with a top silicon layer of approximately 120 nm and 1.4 μm bottom oxide was obtained in the form of 200 mm wafers, which were manually cleaved, and dehydrated for 5 min at 180° C. The wafers were then cleaned with a spin/rinse process in acetone and isopropanol, and air dried. HSQ electron beam resist from Dow Corning Corporation was spin coated at 1000 rpm and baked for 4 min at 180° C. The coated samples were exposed with a Leica EBPG-5000+ electron beam writer at 100 kV. The devices were exposed at a dose of 4000 μc/cm², and the samples were developed in MIF-300 TMAH developer and rinsed with water and isopropanol. The patterned SOI devices were subsequently etched by using an Oxford Plasmalab 100 ICP-RIE within 12 mTorr of chlorine, with 800 W of ICP power and 50 W of forward power applied for 33 s. Microfabricated devices such as the one shown in FIG. 2 were tested by mounting the dies onto an optical stage system with a single-mode optical fiber array. A tunable laser was used first to align each device, and then swept in order to determine the frequency domain behavior of each of the devices. Light was coupled into the waveguides from a fiber mode by the use of grating couplers. Subsequently the devices were spin-coated with 11% 950 K PMMA in Anisole, at 2000 rpm, baked for 20 min at 180° C., and retested.

The theoretical development of the expected behavior of a ring resonator system has been described in the technical literature. In the present case the dispersion of the waveguide compels the addition of a dispersive term to the peak width. We take λ₀ to be the free space wavelength of a resonance frequency of the system, n₀ to be the index of refraction at this wavelength, (dn/δλ)₀, the derivative of n with respect to λ taken at λ₀, L to be the optical path length around the ring, a to be the optical amplitude attenuation factor due to loss in a single trip around the ring, and finally t to be the optical amplitude attenuation factor due to traveling past the coupling region. In the limit of a high Q, and thus

(1−α)

1 and (1−t)

1,

we have

$\begin{matrix} {Q = {\frac{\pi \; L}{\lambda_{0}}{\frac{\left( {n_{0} - {\lambda_{0}\left( \frac{\partial n}{\partial\lambda} \right)}_{0}} \right)}{\left( {1 - {\alpha \; t}} \right)}.}}} & (1) \end{matrix}$

The waveguide mode was coupled into a ring resonator from an adjacent waveguide. As shown in FIG. 2, the adjacent waveguide can in some embodiments be a linear waveguide. The strength of coupling can then be lithographically controlled by adjusting the distance between the waveguide and the ring. This ring was fabricated with a radius of 30 μm, a waveguide width of 500 nm, and a separation between ring and waveguide of 330 nm. For the clad ring presented, the measured Q is 45 000, and the extinction ratio is −22 dB, for the resonance peak at 1512.56 nm. The PMMA clad ring had a similar geometry, and achieved a Q of 57 000, but with an extinction ratio of −15.5 dB. Typical observed transmission spectra are shown in FIG. 3. The typical amount of optical power in the waveguide directly coupling into the resonator was about 0.03 mW. A dependence of the spectrum on this power was not observed, to within an order of magnitude.

From the mode-solving results for the unclad waveguides, we have (dn/δλ)(1.512)=−1.182 μm⁻¹, and n(λ=1.512)=1.688. Using this result and the earlier relations, the waveguide loss can be calculated from the measured Q value. Specifically, an extinction that is at least −22 dB indicates that a critically coupled Q in this geometry is greater than 38 500, which then implies a waveguide loss of less than −7.1 dB/cm. In similar fashion, the PMMA clad waveguide resonator with a Q of 57 000 but only −15.5 dB of extinction allows a worst case waveguide loss of −6.6 dB/cm. This also implies an instrinsic Q of 77 000 for the unclad resonator, and an intrinsic Q of 94 000 for the PMMA clad resonator.

These devices have a slight temperature dependence. Specifically, the resonance peak shifts correspondingly with the change in the refractive index of silicon with temperature, moving over 2 nm as temperature shifts from 18 to 65° C. The Q rises with higher temperatures slightly, from 33 k at 18° C. to 37 k on one device studied. This shift can probably be explained entirely by the dependence of Q on the effective index.

Example 2 High-Q Optical Resonators in Silicon-On-Insulator Based Slot Waveguides

We now describe the design, fabrication and characterization of high Q oval resonators based on slot waveguide geometries in thin silicon on insulator material. Optical quality factors of up to 27,000 were measured in such filters, and we estimate losses of −10 dB/cm in the slotted waveguides on the basis of our resonator measurements. Such waveguides enable the concentration of light to very high optical fields within nano-scale dimensions, and show promise for the confinement of light in low-index material with potential applications for optical modulation, nonlinear optics and optical sensing. As will be appreciated, the precise geometry of a resonator (or other kinds of devices) is frequently a matter of design, and the geometry can be varied based on such considerations as length of waveguide, area of a chip, and required interaction (or required non-interaction), such as coupling (or avoiding coupling) with other waveguide structures that are present in a device or on a chip. In some embodiments, the waveguide can be a closed loop, such as at least one ring or at least one oval shaped endless stripe. As has been explained, optical energy can be provided to such a closed loop, for example with an input waveguide.

One can form high quality factor ring or oval resonators in SOI. In these SOI waveguides, vertical confinement of light is obtained from the index contrast between the silicon core and the low index cladding and the buried silicon dioxide layer, whereas lateral confinement can be obtained by lithographically patterning the silicon. The majority of the light tends to be guided within the silicon core in such waveguide. Although the high refractive index contrast between silicon and its oxide provide excellent optical confinement, guiding within the silicon core can be problematic for some applications. In particular, at very high optical intensities, two-photon absorption in the silicon may lead to high optical losses. Moreover, it is often desirable to maximize the field intensity overlap between the optical waveguide mode and a lower index cladding material when that cladding is optically active and provides electro-optic modulation or chemical sensing.

One solution to these problems involves using a slot waveguide geometry. In a slot waveguide, two silicon stripes are formed by etching an SOI slab, and are separated by a small distance. In one embodiment, the separation is approximately 60 nm. The optical mode in such a structure tends to propagate mainly within the center of the waveguide. In the case of primarily horizontal polarization, the discontinuity condition at the cladding-silicon interface leads to a large concentration of the optical field in the slot or trench between the two stripes. One can predict that the electric field intensity would be approximately 10⁸ vP V/m where P is the input power in watts. FIG. 4 shows the approximate geometry used for the design in this embodiment, as well as the solved mode pattern for light at approximately 1.53 μm. As seen in FIG. 4, the mode profile comprises |E| contours, plotted in increments of 10% of the maximum field value. The E field is oriented primarily parallel to the wafer surface. This mode was obtained from a full vectoral eigensolver based on a finite difference time domain (FDTD) model. Our designs use a 120 nm silicon on insulator layer and 300 nm wide silicon strips on top of a 1.4 μm thick buried oxide layer, which is in turn deposited on a silicon substrate. After the lithographic waveguide definition process, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) was deposited as the top cladding layer. Various widths for the central slot were fabricated to provide test devices with 50, 60 and 70 nm gaps. The mode profile shown in FIG. 4 and the dispersion diagram shown in FIG. 5 are for a 60 nm slot. FIG. 5 is a diagram showing the effective index vs. free space wavelength in microns for the slot waveguide of FIG. 4. Slots larger than 70 nm have also been fabricated and were shown to work well.

In the 1.4-1.6 μm wavelength regime, the waveguide geometry is single mode, and a well-contained optical mode is supported between the two silicon waveguide slabs. There is some loss that such an optical mode will experience even in the absence of any scattering loss or material absorption due to leakage of light into the silicon substrate. The substrate loss can be estimated semi-analytically via perturbation theory, and ranges from approximately −0.15 dB/cm at 1.49 μm to about −0.6 dB/cm at 1.55 μm for the SOI wafer geometry of the present embodiment.

Oval resonators were fabricated by patterning the slot waveguides into an oval shape. An oval resonator geometry was selected in preference to the more conventional circular shape to enable a longer coupling distance between the oval and the external coupling waveguide or input waveguide. See FIG. 6. Slots were introduced into both the oval and external coupling waveguides. FIG. 7 and FIG. 8 show scanning electron micrograph images of an exemplary resonator and the input coupler.

Predicting coupling strength and waveguide losses for such devices is not easy. Many different coupling lengths and ring to input waveguide separations were fabricated and tested. It is well known that the most distinct resonance behavior would be observed for critically coupled resonators, in which the coupling strength roughly matches the round trip loss in the ring.

An analytic expression for the quality factor of a ring resonator was presented in equation (1) hereinabove.

Also, the free spectral range can be calculated via:

$\begin{matrix} {{\Delta \; \lambda} = \frac{\lambda^{2}/L}{n - {\lambda \frac{\partial n}{\partial\lambda}}}} & (2) \end{matrix}$

Here, L is the round trip length in the ring, and n₀ and λ₀ are the index of refraction, and the wavelength at resonance, respectively. The derivative of the effective index with respect to the wavelength at the resonance peak is given by (δn/δλ)₀, and it can be shown that this term is roughly equal to −0.6 μm⁻¹ from the 1.4-1.6 μm spectral range for the slot waveguides studied here.

We have observed a quality factor of 27,000 in a device fabricated with a slot size of 70 nm, a ring to input waveguide edge to edge separation of 650 nm, and a coupling distance of 1.6 μm. The radius of the circular part of the slotted oval was 50 μm. This resonance was observed near 1488 nm, and the resonance peak had an extinction ratio of 4.5 dB. FIG. 9 shows the measured transmission spectrum past the ring, normalized for the input coupler baseline efficiency of our test system. FIG. 10 shows the details of one peak in the vicinity of 1488 nm. Because the extinction ratio at the resonance peak was not very large in this case, it was not possible to accurately determine waveguide losses from this device. By measuring many devices with different geometries, we obtained data on resonators with higher extinction ratios that approached critical coupling. One such device was a 50 μm radius slotted ring resonator with a 60 nm waveguide gap, a ring to input waveguide spacing of 550 nm and coupling length of 1.6 μm. In this device, a Q of 23,400 was observed near 1523 nm, with an on-resonance extinction of 14.7 dB.

Since this resonance is nearly critically coupled, the waveguide loss can be estimated using equation (1) as −10 dB/cm. We can also use equation (2) to further validate our theoretical picture of the ring resonator. The observed free spectral range of this resonator was 2.74 nm, while equation (2) predicts 2.9 nm. This discrepancy is most likely due to small differences in the fabricated dimensions as compared to those for which the numerical solutions were obtained.

To further validate the waveguide loss result, several waveguide loss calibration loops were fabricated with varying lengths of the slot waveguide, ranging from 200 to 8200 urn in length. A total of five center slot waveguide devices were studied for each of the 50, 60 and 70 nm slot widths. Linear regression analysis on the peak transmission of each series yielded waveguide loss figures of 11.6±3.5 dB/cm for the 50 nm center waveguide, 7.7±2.3 dB/cm for the 60 nm center waveguide, and 8.1±1.1 dB/cm for the 70 nm center waveguide. These figures are in agreement with the loss estimated from the oval resonator. Since the theoretical loss due to substrate leakage is much lower than this, it is clear that a great deal of loss is due to surface roughness and possibly material absorption. It is believed that engineering improvements will decrease this loss further. For sensing and modulation applications as well as use in nonlinear optics, the high optical field concentration that can be supported in the cladding material of the slotted waveguide geometry should be very advantageous when compared to more conventional waveguides.

FIG. 11 is a diagram showing a shallow angle SEM view of a silicon-on-insulator ring resonator and waveguide having a sidewall roughness on the order of 10 nm. In the exemplary waveguide shown in FIG. 11, the silicon-insulator bond has been decorated with a brief buffered oxide etch. FIG. 12 is a diagram of a slot ring resonator directional coupler region, and the associated input waveguide.

By comparison, FIG. 13 is a diagram showing a slot waveguide structure that exhibits subfield stitching errors at the edge of the input waveguide in the example shown. Such errors can be devastating for waveguide loss. Because electric fields are known to concentrate at sharp corners or surface irregularities, it is expected that such sharp features occurring at undefined (or random) locations on the surface of a waveguide will have deleterious consequences for the desired electric field profiles. FIG. 14 is yet another example of a rough wall that is likely to create problems in device fabrication and operation. It is therefore preferred that the walls of waveguides according to principles of the invention be constructed so as to minimize the occurrence of sharp features.

Other variations on the geometry of waveguides are possible. FIG. 15 is a diagram showing an exemplary high-index segmented waveguide structures, which in the embodiment shown comprises a central waveguide portion with fingers or ridges sticking out to the sides. With the light localized in the center in a Bloch mode, electrical contact can be established using the fingers or ridges that stick off the sides of the waveguide. This structure provides a way to form both electrical contacts to waveguides and structures that would provide electrical isolation with low optical loss. Through an iterative process involving a combination of optical design using a Hermetian Bloch mode eigensolver and fabrication of actual structures, it was found that (non-slotted) segmented waveguide structures could be constructed in 120 nm thick SOI. Waveguide losses as small as −16 dB per centimeter were observed, and insertion losses as small as −0.16 dB were shown from standard silicon waveguides.

The segmented waveguide structure can also be modeled as regards its expected properties, which can then be compared to actual results. FIG. 16A is a diagram that shows a dispersion diagram of both a segmented waveguide and the normal, unsegmented waveguide, taken on a plane parallel to the substrate that on a z plane that intersects the middle of a segment. FIG. 16B is a diagram that shows modal patterns of the Bloch mode, with contours of |E| plotted, starting at 10% of the max value and with contour increments of 10%. FIG. 16C is a diagram that shows a plot of modal patterns over four periods of a segmented waveguide on a horizontal plane that intersects the silicon layer halfway through.

By utilizing the same type of design methodology as was used for the segmented waveguides, one is able to able to construct structures that provide electrical isolation without substantial optical loss. FIG. 17 is a diagram that shows an exemplary electrical isolator that was constructed and tested, and which provided both a transition from a standard to a slotted waveguide and electrical isolation between the two sides of the slot waveguide. Such structures were shown to have losses on the order of 0.5 dB.

Exemplary Results for Waveguides with Cladding Materials

Examples 1-4 Four-Wave Mixing in Silicon Waveguides with χ³ Polymer Material

Two types of integrated nano-optical silicon waveguide structures were used for this demonstration. The first type of structure was a series of ring resonator structures, which allowed an estimation of the waveguide loss of the nonlinear material. The second type of structures used were long runout devices, which comprised a simple waveguide loop with distances on the order of 0.7 cm. Characterization of loss could be done passively.

For the actual nonlinear testing, a Keopsys EDFA was used to boost two lasers to a high power level, on the order of 30 dBm (1 Watt) or more.

The materials used for the demonstrations were clad on waveguides configured as previously described herein. The chromophore identified as JSC1 is shown by its chemical structure in FIG. 26. The chromophores identified as JSC1 and YLD 124 are two substances among many chromophores that were described in a paper by Alex Jen, et al., “Exceptional electro-optic properties through molecular design and controlled self-assembly,” Proceedings of SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering (2005), 5935 (Linear and Nonlinear Optics of Organic Materials V), 593506/1-593506/13. The paper describes at least five additional specific chromophores, and states in part that a “series of guest-host polymers furnished with high μβ chromophores have shown large electro-optic coefficients around 100˜160 pm/V@1.31 μm.” It is believed that the several examples given in the present description represent a few specific examples of many chromophores that can be used as materials having large nonlinear coefficients χ² and χ³ according to principles of the systems and methods disclosed herein. Four types of claddings were applied to waveguides situated on silicon dies:

-   1. JSC1/APC: The chromophore JSC1 is doped into amorphous     polycarbonate (APC) with the loading of 35 wt %. The solvent we used     is cyclohexanone, and concentration of overall solid in this     solution is 14 wt %. -   2. AJL21/PMMA: The chromophore AJL21 is doped into PMMA with the     loading of 40 wt %. The solvent used was 1,1,2-trichloroethane, and     solution concentration was 10 wt %. -   3. AJL21 monohthic films: The chromophore AJL21 is coated by itself     monolithically. The solvent was 1,1,2 trichloroethane, and the     concentration was 10 wt %. -   4. AJC212 monolithic films: The chromophore AJC212 was coated by     itself monolithically. The solvent was cyclopentanone, and     concentration was 11 wt %. This film may have wetting problems, as     evidenced by periphery shrinkage after baking.

Passive Results

Waveguide loss was measured for each of the four die. Intrinsic waveguide loss with a cladding having an index of 1.46 is about 7 dB/cm. A cladding with n>1.46 would lower this figure slightly. The total loss and the estimated loss due to the polymer are presented separately. This is based on subtracting 7 dB from the polymer, and then multiplying by three, because the polymer causes approximately as third as much loss as it would for the mode if it were in a bulk material, because not all of the optical energy interacts with the polymer.

-   Die 1: 30 dB/cm; 69 dB/cm for bulk polymer -   Die 2: 5.7 dB/cm; <1 dB/cm for bulk polymer -   Die 3: the loss was too high to measure devices -   Die 4: 10 dB/cm; 12 dB/cm for bulk polymer

Active Results

The intrinsic nonlinear response of our EDFA and optical test system was measured to determine a baseline for measurements on devices. FIG. 18 is a diagram showing the results of a baseline measurement of an EDFA and optical test system in the absence of a test sample. As can be seen in FIG. 18, there is a very small amount of four wave mixing that occurs. This test was performed with about 28 dBm of EDFA output. There is 40 dB of extinction from the peak to the sidebands.

A Die 1 loop device with 7000 μm of runlength produced about 29 dB of conversion efficiency (that is, sidebands were 29 dB down from peak at end of run).

FIG. 19 is a diagram showing the results for the measurement of a first exemplary material having a large value of χ³, namely Die 1 with a cladding. Even though the plot looks similar to that shown in FIG. 18, in fact there is an order of magnitude more nonlinear conversion that has occurred. The insertion loss is due to the grating couplers and the waveguide loss in the device.

FIG. 20 is a diagram showing the results for the measurement of a first exemplary material having a large value of χ³, namely Die 2 with a cladding, which showed better results than Die 1. Here there is about 20 dB of extinction from the right peak to the left sideband, and 22 dB from the larger peak on the left to the left sideband. This is the result that represents a demonstration of 1% conversion efficiency.

The noise level on some of these scans is higher than others because some were taken with faster scan settings on the optical signal analyzer.

Semi-Analytic Results

The slowly varying approximation can be used to generate the characteristic equations to predict the conversion efficiency. Let a0(z), a1(z) and a2(z) be the amplitudes of the 3 wavelengths involved in a given .four-wave mixing interaction. Let w2=2*w0−w1. Approximately, E is 10⁸ V/m for 1 Watt of power. so if we take E=a0(z)*10⁸ V/m then a0 is power normalized to be 1 watt when ¦ a0¦=1. The characteristic equations are:

$\begin{matrix} {{\frac{\partial a_{0}}{\partial z} = {6\; f\frac{\; \beta_{0}}{{neff}_{0}^{2}}{\exp \left( {\left( {{{- 2}\; \beta_{0}} + \beta_{1} + \beta_{2}} \right)\; z} \right)}a\; 0*a\; 1a\; 2}}{\frac{\partial a_{1}}{\partial z} = {{3\; f\frac{\; \beta_{1}}{{neff}_{1}^{2}}{\exp \left( {\left( {{2\; \beta_{0}} - \beta_{1} - \beta_{2}} \right)\; z} \right)}a\; 0\; a\; 0\; a\; 2*\frac{\partial a_{2}}{\partial z}} = {3\; f\frac{\; \beta_{2}}{{neff}_{2}^{2}}{\exp \left( {\left( {{2\; \beta_{0}} - \beta_{1} - \beta_{2}} \right)\; z} \right)}a\; 0\; a\; 0\; a\; 1*}}}} & (3) \end{matrix}$

The quantity f is taken as an unknown fraction which reduces the effect of the nonlinear material due to the fact that some of the optical energy is not in the optical region, but in the waveguide core. It is estimated that f is about 0. 1, with an uncertainty of perhaps a factor of 2.

The phasor factor turns out to have an oscillation period on the order of a meter for the waveguides under consideration, and can be ignored. Based on a numerical integration, one can then estimate the χ³ coefficients for die 1 and die 2 as:

-   Die 1: χ³ is nearly 8×10⁻²² (m/V)² -   Die 2: χ³ is approximately 1.5⁻²² (m/V)²

FIG. 21 is a diagram that shows a plot of the numerically computed conversion efficiency for Die 2, in dB vs 1 watt compared to length traveled in waveguide in μm.

The devices that were tested were observed in all cases to eventually fail, either when ramping up the power levels or after extended testing. It is believed that the problem is caused by heating damage. Fortunately the damage seems not to extend to the silicon waveguides. This means that devices that fail in this way can be recovered by stripping the polymers, and then being recoated. With additional experience, solutions for the problem of this damage problem may be identified and solved.

It is unfortunate that the waveguide loss in the die 1 material is so high, because it is a material that exhibits extremely high χ3. Nevertheless, reasonable efficiencies were demonstrated with material exhibiting a lower χ3. It would be advantageous to identify a material with a value of χ3 that is larger by a factor of 10 or so. It would also be advantageous to lower the waveguide loss slightly. With these two adjustments, it would be possible to enter the “strong coupling” regime, so that one might observe 100% conversion in lengths <0.5 cm. One likely possibility would be to lower the optical loss of the Die 1 material, JSC1.

Example 5 Optical Modulation and Detection in Slotted Silicon Waveguides

In some embodiments, an optical input signal can be directly converted to an electrical output signal via a process known as optical rectification. This process occurs when a particularly intense optical beam is incident on a χ2 material, and induces a low frequency electric field as a result. The large magnitude of this electric field is due to the enhancement of the optical field in a slot waveguide. This process has many advantages over conventional detection schemes, such as photodiodes. In particular, there will be nearly no speed limit for this type of detector, because the mechanism is ultrafast and functions at the optical frequency.

In this example, we describe a system and process that provide low power optical detection and modulation in a slotted waveguide geometry filled with nonlinear electro-optic polymers and present examples that demonstrate such methods. The nanoscale confinement of the optical mode, combined with its close proximity to electrical contacts, enables the direct conversion of optical energy to electrical energy, without external bias, via optical rectification, and also enhances electro-optic modulation. We demonstrate this process for power levels in the sub-milliwatt regime, as compared to the kilowatt regime in which optical nonlinear effects are typically observed at short length scales. The results presented show that a new class of detectors based on nonlinear optics can be fabricated and operated.

Waveguide-based integrated optics in silicon provide systems and methods for concentrating and guiding light at the nanoscale. The high index contrast between silicon and common cladding materials enables extremely compact waveguides with very high mode field concentrations, and allows the use of established CMOS fabrication techniques to define photonic integrated circuits. As we have already explained hereinabove, by using slotted waveguides, it is possible to further concentrate a large fraction of the guided mode into a gap within the center of a silicon waveguide. This geometry greatly magnifies the electric field associated with the optical mode, resulting in electric fields of at least (or in excess of) 10⁶ V/m for continuous-wave, sub-milliwatt optical signals. Moreover, since the slotted geometry comprises two silicon strips which can be electrically isolated, a convenient mechanism for electro-optic interaction is provided. The electric field due to a voltage difference between the two slot arms can be extremely high, as the voltage drop occurs over a very small distance. If one compares a waveguide with a 100 nm gap to electrodes separated by 4 μm, as is typical for conventional electro-optic modulators, the same voltage provides a 40 times larger electric field in the slot waveguide. Such waveguides can be fabricated with low loss. We have previously described systems that provide losses below −10 dB/cm.

In the present example, we exploit both the high intensity of the optical field and the close proximity of the electrodes for several purposes. First, we demonstrate detection of optical signals via direct conversion to electrical energy by means of nonlinear optical rectification. An exemplary device comprises a ring resonator with an electro-optic polymer based χ² material deposited as a cladding. Inside the slot, the high optical field intensity creates a standing DC field, which creates a virtual voltage source between the two silicon electrodes, resulting in a measurable current flow, in the absence of any external electrical bias. Though optical rectification has been observed in electro-optic polymers, typically instantaneous optical powers on the order of 1 kW are needed for observable conversion efficiencies, often achieved with pulsed lasers. The exemplary embodiment provides measurable conversion with less than 1 mW of non-pulsed input, obtained from a standard, low power tunable laser operating near 1500 nm.

In one embodiment, systems and methods of the invention provide standard Pockels effect based modulation, which is similarly enhanced by means of the very small scale of our device. The close proximity of the electrodes, and ready overlap with the optical mode, causes an external voltage to produce a far larger effective electric modulation field, and therefore refractive index shift, than would be obtained through conventional waveguide designs. In one embodiment, the modulation and refractive index shift is provided by tuning the resonance frequencies of a slot waveguide ring resonator.

Device Fabrication Waveguide Fabrication

The devices described in this example were fabricated in electronic grade silicon-on-insulator (SOI) with a top layer thickess of 110 nm and an oxide thickness of 1.3 microns. The silicon layer is subsequently doped to approximately 10¹⁹ Phosphorous atoms/cm³, yielding resistivities after dopant activation of about 0.025 ohm-cm. Electro-optic (“EO”) polymers were then spin-deposited onto the waveguide structures and subsequently poled by using a high field applied across the slot in the waveguide.

Lithography was performed using a Leica EBPG 5000+ electron beam system at 100 kv. Prior to lithography, the samples were manually cleaved, cleaned in acetone and isopropanol, baked for 20 minutes at 180 C, coated with 2 percent HSQ resist from Dow Coming Corporation, spun for two minutes at 1000 rpm, and baked for an additional 20 minutes. The samples were exposed at 5 nm step size, at 3500 μC/cm². The samples were developed in AZ 300 TMAH developer for 3 minutes, and etched on an Oxford Instruments PLC Plasmalab 100 with chlorine at 80 sccm, forward power at 50 W, ICP power at 800 W, 12 mTorr pressure, and 33 seconds of etch time. The samples were then implanted with phosphorous at normal incidence, 3 OkeV energy, and 1×10¹⁴ ions/cm² density. The sample was annealed under a vacuum at 950 C in a Jipilec Jetstar rapid thermal annealer. The samples were dipped in buffered hydrofluoric acid in order to remove the remnants of electron beam resist from the surface.

After initial optical testing, the samples were coated with YLD 124 electro-optic polymer, and in one case with dendrimer-based electro-optic material. The samples were stored under a vacuum at all times when they were not being tested, in order to reduce the chances of any degradation.

Synthesis of YLD 124 Coating Solution

FIG. 22 is a diagram showing a chemical reaction useful for the synthesis of a chromophore referred to as YLD 124. The compound denoted in FIG. 22 by 1 is discussed in the paper by C. Zhang, L. R. Dalton, M. C. Oh, H. Zhang, W. H. Steier, entitled “Low V-pi electro-optic modulators from CLD-1: Chromophore design and synthesis, material processing, and characterization,” which was published in Chem. Mater., volume 13, pages 3043-3050 (2001).

To a solution of 0.56 g (0.96 mmol) of 1 and 0.36 g of 2 (1.1 mmol) in 1.5 mL of THF was added 6 mL of absolute ethanol. The mixture was stirred for 6 h at room temperature. The precipitate was collected by filtration and washed by ethanol and methanol. The crude product was dissolved in minimum amount of CH₂CI₂. The resultant solution was added dropwisely to 100 mL of methanol. The product (0.76 g) was collected as dark green precipitate. Yield was 90%. ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): 8.05 (t, J=13.6 Hz, IH), 7.45-7.58 (m, 5 H), 7.38 (d, J=8.9 Hz, 2H) 6.93 (d, J=15.9 Hz, I H) 6.79 (d, J=15.9 Hz, 1H), 6.70 (d, J=8.9 Hz, 2H), 6.40-6.25 (m, 3H), 3.80 (t, J=5.8 Hz, 4H), 3.59 (t, J=5.8 Hz, 4H), 2.42 (s, 2H), 2.40 (s, 2H), 1.04 (s, 3H), 0.98 (s, 311), 0.90 (s, 18H), 0.04 (5, 12H). MS (ESP): 879.48 (M+H). UV-Vis (THF): 765 nm. m.p. 173° C.

One part of YLD 124 was mixed with three parts of APC (Poly[Bisphenol A carbonate-co-4,4′-(3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexylidene)diphenol carbonate]). The mixture was dissolved in cyclopentanone. The total solid content (YLD 124 and APC) is about 12%. The resultant solution was filtered through a 0.2 pm filter before being used on the device to provide a cladding layer comprising the chromophore YLD 124.

Measurement Results Optical Rectification Based Detection

FIG. 23 is a four panel diagram that shows details of one embodiment of an optical modulator device, including the geometry of the photodetectors and filters, and including a cross section of the slotted waveguide. Panel A of FIG. 23 shows a cross section of the device geometry with optical mode superimposed on a waveguide. In FIG. 23(A), the optical mode was solved using a finite-difference based Hermetian Eigensolver, such as that described by A. Taflove, Computational Electrodynamics, (Artech House, Boston. Mass., 1995), and has an effective index of approximately 1.85 at 1500 nm. Most of the electric field is parallel to the plane of the chip, and it is possible to contact both sides of the slot in a slotted ring resonator, as shown in FIG. 23(B). Panel B of FIG. 23 shows a SEM image of the resonator electrical contacts. Electrically isolated contacts between the silicon rails defining the slotted waveguide introduce only about 0.1 dB of optical loss. Panel C of FIG. 23 shows the logical layout of device, superimposed on a SEM image of a device. FIG. 23(C) details the layout of a complete slotted ring resonator, with two contact pads connected to the outer half of the ring, and two pads electrically connected to the inner half of the ring. A shunt resistor provides a means of confirming electrical contact, and typical pad-to-pad and pad-to-ring resistances range from 1 MO to 5 MO. FIG. 23(D) displays a typical electrically contacted slotted ring described in this study. Panel D of FIG. 23 is an image of the ring and the electrical contact structures.

Measurements were performed with single-mode polarization maintaining input and output fibers, grating coupled to slotted waveguides with an insertion loss of approximately 8 dB. Optical signal was provided from an Agilent 81680a tunable laser and in some cases an erbium doped fiber amplifier (“EDFA”) from Keopsys Corporation. A continuous optical signal inserted into a poled polymer ring results in a measurable current established between the two pads, which are electrically connected through a pico-Ammeter. In the most sensitive device, a DC current of ˜1.3 nA was observed, indicating an electrical output power of ˜10⁻⁹ of the optical input power (5×10⁻¹² W of output for approximately 0.5 mW coupled into the chip). Control devices, in which PMMA or un-poled EO material was substituted, show no photo current.

The fact that there is no external bias (or indeed any energy source) other than the optical signal applied to the system of this embodiment demonstrates conclusively that power is being converted from the optical signal. To establish that the conversion mechanism is actually optical rectification, we performed a number of additional measurements. A steady bias was applied to the chip for several minutes, as shown in Table 1A. A substantial change in the photoresponse of the device was observed. This change depends on the polarity of the bias voltage, consistent with the expected influence of repoling of the device in-place at room temperature. Specifically, if the external bias was applied opposing the original poling direction, conversion efficiency generally decreased, while an external bias in the direction of the original poling field increased conversion efficiency.

In the present invention, we understand that an optical material can be subject to spatially periodic repoling of the electrooptic material, for example to provide a particular functionality, such as a nonlinear or exponential functionality or behavior.

TABLE I Poling Results Part A: Action New Steady State Current (6 dBm input) Initial State −5.7 pA +10 V for 2 minutes 0 pA −10 V for 2 minutes −7.1 pA +10 V for 2 minutes −4.4 pA +10 V for 4 minutes −6.1 pA −10 V for 4 minutes −4.5 PA −10 V for 2 minutes −14.8 pA Part B: Current Polarity of Device Action Optical Rectification 1 Positive Poling Positive 1 Thermal Cycling to Rapid fluctuation, did poling temperature with not settle no_voltage 1 Negative Poling Negative 2 Negative Poling Negative 2 Thermal Cycling to None observable Poling temperature with no voltage 2 Positive Poling Negative 3 Negative Poling Negative 4 Positive Poling Positive 5 Negative Poling Negative

To further understand the photo-conversion mechanism, 5 EO detection devices were poled with both positive and negative polarities, thus reversing the direction of the relative χ² tensors. For these materials, the direction of χ² is known to align with the polling E field direction, and we have verified this through Pockels' effect measurements. In all but one case, we observe that the polarity of the generated potential is the same as that used in poling, and the +V terminal during poling acts as the −V terminal in spontaneous current generation, as shown in Table 1B. Furthermore, the polarity of the current is consistent with a virtual voltage source induced through optical rectification. It was observed that these devices decay significantly over the course of testing, and that in one case the polarity of the output current was even observed to spontaneously switch after extensive testing. However, the initial behavior of the devices after polling seems largely correlated to the χ² direction.

Part A of Table I shows the dependence of the steady state observed current after room temperature biasing with various voltage polarities for one device. The device was originally polled with a ˜12 V bias, though at 110 C. With one exception, applying a voltage in the direction of the original polling voltage enhances current conversion efficiencies, while applying a voltage against the direction of the polling voltage reduces the current conversion efficiencies. It should be noted that the power coupled on-chip in these measurements was less than 1 mW due to coupler loss.

Part B of Table I shows the behavior of several different devices immediately after thermal polling or cycling without voltage. Measurements were taken sequentially from top to bottom for a given device. The only anomaly is the third measurement on device 2; this was after significant testing, and the current observed was substantially less than was observed in previous tests on the same device. We suspect that the polymer was degraded by repeated testing in this case.

A number of measurements were performed to attempt to produce negative results, and to exclude the possibility of a mistaken measurement of photocurrent. The power input to the chip was turned on and off by simply moving the fiber array away from the chip mechanically, without changing the circuit electrically, and the expected change in the electrical output signal of our detector was observed. A chip was coated in polymethylmethacrylate and tested, resulting in no observed photocurrents. Also, when some of the devices shown in Table I were tested before any polling had been performed; no current was observed.

We used a lock-in amplifier to establish a quantitative relationship between the laser power in the EQ material and the photo-current, and achieved a noise floor of about 0.2 pA. This resulted in a reasonable dynamic range for the 10-200 pA photocurrent readings. FIG. 24(A) and FIG. 24(B) show optical transmission curves for typical devices. FIG. 24(C) shows several traces of output current versus input laser power, and a fairly linear relationship is observed. The relationship I=cP, where I is the output current, P is the input laser power, and c is a proportionality constant ranging from 88±10 pA/mW at a 1 kHz lock-in measurement and when the wavelength is on resonance, changing to a lower value of 58±8 pA/mW off resonance for the best device. It is important to note that current was easily observed with only a pico-ammeter, or by simply connecting an oscilloscope to the output terminal and observing the voltage deflection.

Panel A of FIG. 24 shows the transmission spectrum of detector device 1. Panel B of FIG. 24 shows the transmission spectrum of detector device 2. Panel C of FIG. 24 shows several curves of current vs. power for three measurement series. Series 1 is of the first device with the wavelength at 1549.26 nm, on a resonance peak. Series 2 is the first device with the wavelength at 1550.5 nm off resonance. Series 3 is for device 2, with the wavelength at 1551.3 nm, on resonance. Finally, panel D of FIG. 24 shows the output current as a function of wavelength, overlaid with the transmission spectrum. The transmission spectrum has been arbitrarily resealed to show the contrast.

As another demonstration of the dependence of the output current on the amount of light coupled into the resonator, we also tuned the laser frequency and measured the output current. As can be seen in FIG. 24(D), the amount of output current increases as the laser is tuned onto a resonance peak. This again indicates that the overlap between the EO polymer in the resonator and the optical mode is responsible for the photo-current. We have overlaid a photocurrent vs. wavelength response scan to show the resonance peaks for comparison. It should not be surprising that a small photocurrcnt is still measured when the laser is off resonance, since the amount of radiation in a low-Q ring resonator is non-negligible oven off resonance. We have successfully observed this detector function at speeds up to 1 MHz, without significant observable rolloff. This is again consistent with optical rectification. Unfortunately, our devices could not be measured at higher speeds, due to substantial output impedance.

The conversion efficiency from our first measurements is thought to be several orders of magnitude below the ultimate limit, and can be explained by the high insertion losses in our system. In the present embodiment, 75% of the input power in the fiber is not coupled onto the chip. Our low-Q resonators only provide a limited path length within which light can interact with the electro-optic material. Furthermore, by design a great deal of the light in the resonator will be dumped to an output port, and not absorbed. It is expected that with further design and higher Q resonators, the efficiency of these devices can be greatly increased. It is, however, important to note that nothing about this effect depends on the presence of rings. The rings provide a convenient and compact device for observing these effects, but one could just as easily observe optical rectification by using other geometries, such as a long linear, polymer coated, split waveguide, with each side connected to an electrical pad.

Pockels' Effect Modulation

At DC, the Pockels effect was measured by applying varying voltages to the device and observing the device transmission as a function of wavelength. For devices having operative modulation, the resonance peaks were shifted, often to a noticeable degree. To counter the systemic drift due to temperature fluctuations, a series of random voltages were applied to a device under test and the wavelength responses noted. The intersection of a resonance peak and a certain extinction, chosen to be at least 10 dB above the noise floor, was followed across multiple scans. A 2d linear regression was performed, resulting in two coefficients, one relating drift to time, and one relating drift to voltage.

At AC, a square wave input voltage was applied across the device. The input wavelength was tuned until the output signal had the maximum extinction. It was determined what power levels were implied by the output voltage, and then the observed power levels were fit to a wavelength sweep of the resonance peak. This readily allowed the tuning range to be calculated. We successfully measured AC tuning up to the low MHz regime. The limitation at these frequencies was noise in our electrical driving signal path, and not, as far as we can tell, any rolloff in the modulation process itself.

FIG. 25 is a diagram showing the use of the structures embodying the invention as resonantly enhanced electro-optic modulators, and a result at approximately 6 MHz operating frequency, representing a bit pattern generated by Pockels' Effect modulation of 5 dB. The vertical axis represents input voltage and output power, both in arbitrary units. The horizontal axis represents time in units of microseconds. Voltage swing on the input signal is 20 volts. These measurements clearly demonstrate that low-voltage electro-optic tuning and modulation can be achieved in the same geometries as have been described for photodetection. It should be emphasized that these devices are not optimized as modulators. By increasing the Q of the resonators to exceed 20,000, which has been described hereinabove, it will be possible to achieve much larger extinction values per applied voltage.

By utilizing new dendrimer-based electro-optic materials, we have achieved 0.042±008 nm/V, or 5.2±1 GHZ/V for these rings. This implies an r₃₃ of 79±15 pm/V. This result is better than those obtained for rings of 750 micron radius, which we believe to be the best tuning figure published to date. By contrast, our rings have radii of 40 microns. We credit our improvement over the previous results mainly to the field enhancement properties of our waveguide geometry.

Additional Results

Optical modulators are a fundamental component of optical data transmission systems, They are used to convert electrical voltage into amplitude modulation of an optical carrier frequency, and they can serve as the gateway from the electrical to the optical domain. High-bandwidth optical signals can be transmitted through optical fibers with low loss and low latency. All practical high-speed modulators that are in use today require input voltage shifts on the order of 1V to obtain full extinction. However it is extremely advantageous in terms of noise performance for modulators to operate at lower drive voltages. Many sensors and antennas generate only millivolts or less. As a result it is often necessary to include an amplifier in optical transmission systems, which often limits system performance. By using silicon nano-slot waveguide designs and optical polymers, it is possible today to construct millivolt-scale, broadband modulators. In some embodiments, a millivolt-scale signal is one having a magnitude of hundreds of millivolts. In some embodiments, a millivolt-scale signal is one having a magnitude of tens of millivolts. In some embodiments, a millivolt-scale signal is one having a magnitude of units of millivolts. Using novel nanostructured waveguide designs, we have demonstrated a 100× improvement in Vp over conventional electro-optic polymer modulators.

A variety of physical effects are available to produce optical modulation, including the acousto-optic effect, the Pockels effect either in hard materials, such as lithium niobate or in electro-optic polymers, free-carrier or plasma effects, electro-absorption, and thermal modulation. For many types of optical modulation, the basic design of a modulator is similar; a region of waveguide on one arm of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer is made to include an active optical material that changes index in response to an external signal. This might be, for instance, a waveguide of lithium niobate, or a semiconductor waveguide in silicon. In both cases, a voltage is introduced to the waveguide region by means of external electrodes. This causes the active region to shift in index slightly, causing a phase delay on the light traveling down one arm of the modulator. When the light in that arm is recombined with light that traveled down a reference arm, the phase difference between the two signals causes the combined signal to change in amplitude, with this change depending on the amount of phase delay induced on the phase modulation arm. Other schemes, where both arms are modulated in order to improve performance, are also common.

The measure of the strength of a modulation effect is how much phase shift is obtained for a given input voltage. Typical conventional modulators obtain effective index shifts on the order of 0.004% for 1 V. This implies that a Mach-Zehnder 1 cm in length would require 1 V of external input for the arms to accumulate a relative phase shift of p radians. This voltage is known as the Vp (or V_(pi)). Because generating high-speed and high-power signals requires specialized amplifiers, particularly if broadband perfonnance is required, lowering the operating voltage of modulators is extremely desirable, particularly for on-chip integrated electronic/photonic applications where on-chip voltages are limited to levels available in CMOS. FIG. 27 shows a diagram of a Mach-Zehnder modulator with a conventional electrode geometry.

FIG. 27 is a top-down view of a simple conventional Mach-Zehnder polymer interferometer, showing top contact, waveguide, and bottom contact layers. Such a device is usually operated in ‘push/pull’ mode, where either opposite voltages are applied to the different arms, or where the two arms are poled in opposite directions to achieve the same effect.

In the past several years, silicon has gained attention as an ideal optical material for integrated optics, in particular at telecommunications wavelengths. Low loss optical devices have been built, and modulation obtained through free carrier effects. One of the waveguides that can be supported by silicon is the so-called slot waveguide geometry. This involves two ridges of silicon placed close to each other, with a small gap between them. As shown above with regard to FIGS. 23, 24 and 25, we have demonstrated modulation regions based on filling this gap with a nonlinear material, and using the two waveguide halves as electrodes. In such a geometry, the silicon is doped to a level that allows electrical conductivity without causing substantial optical losses. This allows the two wires or ridges to serve both as transparent electrical contacts and as an optical waveguide.

Using slot waveguides, we previously obtained an improvement in modulation strength of nearly 5× when compared to the best contemporary conventional waveguide geometries with electrodes separated from the waveguide, with the initial, non-optimized designs. This improvement was based on the remarkably small width of the gap across which the driving voltage drops. It is expected that smaller gaps translate into higher field per Volt, and the Pockels Effect depends on the local strength of the electric field. The smaller the gap, the larger the index shift. A unique property of slot waveguides is that, even as these gaps become nanoscale, the divergence conditions on the electric field require that much of the optical mode remains within the central gap. As a result, changing the index within a nanoscale gap can give a remarkably large change in the waveguide effective index. Because of these divergence conditions, the optical mode's effective index is largely determined by the shift found even in very small gaps.

A number of approaches have been proposed for developing low Vp modulators. Different proposed approaches rely the development of new electrooptic materials, or on optical designs that trade bandwidth for sensitivity, either through the use of resonant enhancement, or through dispersion engineering. The designs presented herein are based upon conventional, high-bandwidth Mach-Zehnder traveling wave approaches, but achieve appreciable benefits from using nano-slot waveguides. Of course, these designs can also take advantage of the newest and best electrooptic polymers. In principle, any material that can be coated conformally onto the surface of the silicon waveguides and that is reasonably resistive could be used to provide modulation in these systems, making the system extremely general.

FIG. 28 shows a top-down view of a simple conventional Mach-Zehnder polymer interferometer, showing top contact, waveguide, and bottom contact layers. Such a device is usually operated in ‘push/pull’ mode, where either opposite voltages are applied to the different arms, or where the two arms are poled in opposite directions to achieve the same effect.

FIG. 29 shows an illustrative layout of a slot-waveguide based optical modulator.

FIG. 30 shows an illustrative detailed top-down view of the optical waveguide and metal contacts of the slot-waveguide based optical modulator of FIG. 29.

We have developed an analytic model to express the modulation strength that will be observed in a given slot waveguide geometry. Assuming that a nonlinear electo-optic polymer is used, the local shift in dielectric constant can be expressed as Eqn. (4):

δε=|E _(dc) |vv′(n ⁴ r ₃₃)   (4)

Here v is the unit vector of the direction of the de electric field, and n is the bulk refractive index of the nonlinear polymer. Note that de is a second rank tensor in Eqn. (4). It has been assumed that the poling dc field is identical to the modulation de field. Nonlinear polymers have become increasingly strong in recent years, with some of the most recently developed material having an r₃₃ of 500 pm/V. This corresponds to an on axis χ² moment of 4.2×10⁻⁹ m/V.

With the optical mode known, the shift in effective index is given by Eqn. (5):

$\begin{matrix} {\frac{\partial n}{\partial V} = {\gamma \left( {n^{4}r_{33}} \right)}} & (5) \end{matrix}$

The key parameter for any waveguide involving a nonlinear electro-optic material is γ, which we term the effective index susceptibility. γ is independent of the nonlinear material properties, and depends only on the waveguide geometry, and is given by Eqn. (6):

$\begin{matrix} {\gamma = {\frac{\int{{{E_{opt} \cdot v}}^{2}ɛ_{0}{{w\left( {E_{dc} \cdot v} \right)}/V}{A}}}{\int{2\; {{Re}\left( {{{Ex}_{opt}^{*}{Hy}_{opt}} - {{Ey}_{opt}^{*}{Hx}_{opt}}} \right)}{A}}}\frac{1}{k_{0}}}} & (6) \end{matrix}$

The ultimate Vπ that can be obtained is inversely proportional to γ. It is noteworthy that this model accurately predicts Steier et al's results, as shown described below.

For a conventional all-polymer geometry with electrodes external to the waveguide, γ is 0.026 μm⁻¹. For the slot waveguide that we used in our previous experiments, γ was 0.4 μm⁻¹. Finally, for a more optimal design, shown in FIG. 33, has a γ of 2.3 μm⁻. This design comprises a 200 nm thick silicon-on-insulator layer on a silicon dioxide substrate that is etched to create arms with widths of 200 nm with a 20 nm gap between them, which is described in more detail as design #3 presented in Table 2 below. This geometry enjoys an increase of about a factor of 100 in the tuning sensitivity compared to the conventional electrode geometry; this corresponds to a decrease by a factor of 100 in the Vp needed for modulation. These numbers assume a minimum lithographic linewidth of 20 nm, which is easily achievable today with electron beam lithography. Narrower linewidths are expected to further improve the achievable performance.

FIG. 31A and FIG. 31B show a conventional electrode geometry for a nonlinear polymer waveguide described by Steier (Tazawa, H. & Steier, W. H., “Analysis of ring resonator-based traveling-wave modulators,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters 18, 211-213 (2006)). FIG. 31A shows the optical mode with |E| plotted in increments of 10%, for a mode with propagating power of 1 Watt. FIG. 31B shows a contour plot of the static electric field, with the field of view slightly enlarged. FIG. 31C and FIG. 31D show analogous data for an improved slot waveguide geometry according to the present invention. In the slot waveguide, the silicon provides both the optical guiding layer and the electrical contacts.

The most recent nonlinear polymers achieve a high nonlinear coefficient, expressed as an r33 of 500 pm/V. Using this in combination with the high susceptibilities described above, it is believed that it is possible today to construct a 1 cm Mach-Zehnder modulator with a Vp of 8 mV. This corresponds to a ring resonator with a tuning sensitivity of 795 GHz/V. Both of these values are two orders of magnitude better than the performance obtained by current approaches. Current commercially available modulators typically have Vp's from 1 to 9 V, and current tunable electro-optic polymer based resonators achieve 1 GHz/V of tunability. If the r33 value of 33 pm/V demonstrated by Steier for conventional polymer designs is used, then a Vp of 64 mV and a resonator tunability of 50 GHz/V are obtained.

Segmented waveguide contact structures can be formed that allow very low resistance electrical contact to slot waveguides. We have described above, in similar circumstances, electrical contact to waveguides can be established via segmented waveguides. See FIG. 23B and FIG. 23D and the discussion related thereto. When the RC circuits implied by the segmentation geometry and the gap are examined, it is found that RC turn on times on the order of 200 GHz or more are achievable. Because the nonlinear polymers exhibit an ultrafast nonlinearity, these waveguide geometries present a path to making Terahertz scale optical modulators. Because the modulation is so strong, it is also possible to trade the length of the modulator against Vp. For example, our optimal geometry is expected obtain a Vp of 0.6 V with a 100 um long Mach-Zehnder modulator. This device is expected be exceptionally simple to design for 10 GHz operation, as it could likely be treated as a lumped element. We have shown above that lateral contact structures with low loss and low resistance can be constructed with these slot waveguides. See FIG. 23B and FIG. 23D and the discussion related thereto.

We believe these nano-slot waveguide designs present a path to realizing very high speed, low Voltage modulators. The physical principles involved in such devices are based on employing a nonlinear material of at least moderate resistivity, and a high index contrast waveguide with tight lithographic tolerances. Therefore, it is expected that nano-slot waveguides, either as Mach-Zehnder or ring-based devices, are likely an advantageous geometry for optical modulation with nonlinear materials in many situations. In addition, materials compatibility and processing issues are greatly reduced for such devices compared to conventional multilayer patterned polymer modulator structures.

These high index contrast devices have (or are expected to have) extremely small bend radii, which are often orders of magnitude smaller than corresponding all-polymer designs with low loss and high Q. These geometric features translate into extremely high free spectral ranges for ring modulators, compact devices, and wide process latitudes for their fabrication. Given the inexpensive and readily available foundry SOI and silicon processes available today, and the commercial availability of electron beam lithography at sub-10 nm line resolution, it is expected that slot-waveguide based modulators are likely to replace conventional modulators in many applications in the coming years.

Waveguide Susceptibility

The primary design goal of any electro-optic waveguide geometry is to maximize the amount of shift in effective index that can occur due to an external voltage. The exact modal patterns for these waveguides can be calculated using a Hennetian eigensolver on the FDTD grid. Once the modal patterns are known, the shift in effective index due to an index shift in part of the waveguide can be readily calculated. The static electric field due to the two waveguide anns acting as electrodes can be calculated by simply solving the Poisson equation.

The use of nonlinear polymers with slot waveguides provides an anisotropic effect on the local dielectric constant of the material when exposed to an electric field. The local shift in relative dielectric constant for the optical frequency can be expressed as in Eqn. (4) above.

Consider the x-y plane to be the plane of the waveguide, while the z direction is the direction of propagation. In this case, the total shift in effective index for the optical mode can be calculated to be that given in Eqn (7):

$\begin{matrix} {{\delta \; n} = {\frac{\int{{{E_{opt}{\cdot v}}}^{2}ɛ_{0}{w\left( {E_{d\; c} \cdot v} \right)}{A}}}{\int{2\; {{Re}\left( {{{Ex}_{opt}^{*}{Hy}_{opt}} - {{Ey}_{opt}^{*}{Hx}_{opt}}} \right)}\; {A}}}\frac{1}{k_{0}}\delta \; {ɛ\left( {n^{4}r_{33}} \right)}}} & (7) \end{matrix}$

The integral in the numerator is taken over only regions where the nonlinear polymer has been deposited, while the integral in the denominator should be taken over all space. Note that Eqn. (7) presumes that in the poling process, any region where the nonlinear polymer is exposed to a de field is poled to the maximal extent; that is, the maximal r₃₃ will be demonstrated in the resulting material. In regions where the de field is very small, this is unlikely to be the case, but these regions already do not contribute to Eqn. (7) much anyway, so this approximation is unlikely to cause substantial error.

The particular strength of the polymer, however, is not directly relevant to the configuration of the waveguide geometry. It is convenient to factor the last term out of Eqn (7), leaving what we will define as the effective index susceptibility as shown above in Eqn (5), reproduced here for the convenience of the reader.

$\begin{matrix} {\gamma = {\frac{\int{{{E_{opt} \cdot v}}^{2}ɛ_{0}{{w\left( {E_{d\; c} \cdot v} \right)}/V}{A}}}{\int{2\; {{Re}\left( {{{Ex}_{opt}^{*}{Hy}_{opt}} - {{Ey}_{opt}^{*}{Hx}_{opt}}} \right)}{A}}}\frac{1}{k_{0}}}} & (5) \end{matrix}$

Here V has been introduced, the external voltage that corresponds to E_(dc). The units of the effective index susceptibility are m⁻¹. The derivative of the effective index with respect to applied voltage is then as shown above in Eqn. (6) reproduced here for the convenience of the reader.

$\begin{matrix} {\frac{\partial n}{\partial V} = {\gamma \left( {n^{4}r_{33}} \right)}} & (6) \end{matrix}$

This relationship expresses how much the effective index of the waveguide shifts in response to a change in index in one of it's constituent parts. Before continuing, it is useful to note an approximate maximum value for Eqn (5). In the case that the mode were contained entirely inside a material of a given index, we would have n+δn=√{square root over (ε+δε)}. It is in this situation that the mode is maximally sensitive to a shift in the waveguide index. Thus, in the most sensitive case we would have the value of γ as given by Eqn. (8):

γ=1(2n)(E _(dc) ·v)/V   (8)

Here it has been assumed that the de field is uniform over the entire waveguide region. This provides a useful approximate upper bound on the effective index susceptibility that we can expect to obtain from any waveguide design.

Before proceeding, however, we must consider how the performance of various active devices depend on the effective index susceptibility. A Mach-Zehnder modulator can be formed by having both arms made of a slot waveguide with infiltrated nonlinear polymer. Note that in Eqn. (6), there is no constraint on the sign of the shift in index. Therefore, a change in the sign of the voltage will change the sense of the shift in index shift. Modulator performance is often characterized by V_(p), the amount of voltage needed to obtain a relative p of phase shift between the two arms. The optimal modulator design, with one arm positively biased and one arm negatively biased, has a V_(p) given by Eqn. (9):

$\begin{matrix} {V_{\pi} = \frac{\pi}{2\; k_{0}{L\left( {{\partial n}/{\partial V}} \right)}}} & (9) \end{matrix}$

Here L is the length of the Mach-Zehnder, and k₀ is the free space wavenumber of the optical signal under modulation. State of the art results for Vp's for optical modulators are currently on the order of 1-5 V.

Ring resonators have also been used to enable optical signals to be modulated or switched based on a nonlinear polymer being modulated by an external voltage. In this case, the performance of the tunable ring resonator is usually reported in the frequency shift of a resonance peak due to an externally applied voltage. This can be expressed as shown in Eqn. (10):

$\begin{matrix} {\frac{\partial f}{\partial V} = \frac{{- \frac{c}{\lambda}}\frac{\partial n}{\partial V}}{\left( {n - {\lambda \frac{\partial n}{\partial\lambda}}} \right)}} & (10) \end{matrix}$

Results of 1 GHz/V have recently been reported for ring resonators based on large electrodes, We have observed 5.2 GHz/V of tuning.

Waveguide Geometries

We now describe several different waveguide geometries, and show the effective index susceptibility as a function of the slot sizes of the waveguide. In all cases, the modes have been solved using the aforementioned Hermetian eigensolver, and Eqn. (5). The susceptibilities are calculated near a 1550 nm free space wavelength. However, the values obtained will not vary much from 1480 nm to 1600 nm as the modal pattern does not change significantly. In the embodiments described, the waveguides are composed of silicon, and assumed to rest on a layer of silicon dioxide. The top cladding is a nonlinear polymer with an index of 1.7. This is similar to the waveguide geometry that we have used in our modulation work described hereinabove. FIG. 31 shows the static electric fields solved as part of analyzing waveguide design 1 with a gap of 40 nm, as described in Table 2. As one would expect, the field is nearly entirely concentrated inside the slot area. The field shown was calculated assuming a voltage difference of 1 Volt. It is slightly larger than simply the reciprocal of the gap size due to the singular nature of the solution to Poisson's equation near the corners of the waveguide.

FIGS. 31A and 31B illustrate solved field patterns for the analysis of waveguide 1 at a 40 nm gap. FIG. 31A shows the static voltage potential field distribution due to charging the two electrodes. FIG. 31B shows the electric field due to the potential distribution. |E| is plotted in increments of 10%.

We have constrained ourselves to use waveguide geometries that have minimum feature sizes of at least 20 nm. These are near the minimum feature sizes that can be reliably fabricated using e-beam lithography. Table 2 lists a description of each type of waveguide studied. Each waveguide was studied for a number of different gap sizes. In all cases, the maximum susceptibility was obtained at the minimum gap size. The maximum gap size studied and the susceptibility at this point are also listed. In some cases, the study was terminated because at larger gap sizes, the mode is not supported; this is noted in Table 2. For multislot waveguide designs where there are N arms, there are N-1 gaps; the design presumes that alternating arms will be biased either at the input potential or ground.

Table 2 shows the effective index susceptibility for various waveguide designs.

FIGS. 32A and 32B illustrate solved field patterns for the analysis of waveguide 1 at a 40 nm gap.

The dependence of susceptibility on gap size is presented in FIG. 33 for several waveguides. The susceptibility is approximately inversely proportional to gap size.

It is clear that within the regime of slotted waveguides, it is always advantageous to make the slot size smaller, at least down to the 20 nm gap we have studied. This causes the dc electric field to increase, while the optical mode tends to migrate into the slot region, preventing any falloff due to the optical mode failing to overlap the modulation region.

TABLE 2 Waveguide Waveguide Arm Sizes Design Height (nm) (nm) Maximum γ (um⁻¹) Minimum γ (um⁻¹) 1 100 300, 300 1.3, 20 nm gap .40, 140 nm gap 2 150 300, 300 1.6, 20 nm gap .68, 120 nm gap 3 200 300, 300 2.3, 20 nm gap .74, 120 nm gap 4 100 400, 400 1.1, 20 nm gap .67, 60 nm gap, modal limit 5 100 250, 250 1.2, 20 nm gap .56, 60 nm gap, modal limit 6 100 300, 40, 300 1.6, 20 nm gap .53, 80 nm gap, modal limit 7 100 300, 40, 40, 1.9, 20 nm gap .76, 60 nm gap, 300 modal limit 8 200 200, 40, 200 3, 20 nm gap 1.4, 60 nm gap, modal limit 9 300 300, 300 2.5, 20 nm gap 2.5, 20 nm gap, modal limit Steier et Al. N/A N/A .026, 10 um gap N/A

In examining the results of our calculations, it is useful to calculate the maximum susceptibilities that can be obtained. For an effective index of about 2, which is approximately correct for these waveguides, and a gap size of 20 nm, the maximum achievable γ is approximately 12.5 um⁻¹. Thus, for a gap size of 20 nm, waveguide design 8 is already within 25% of the theoretical maximum value.

It is also worth noting the corresponding γ value that can be obtained by calculation using our methods for the separated electrode approach of Steier. The effective index of the mode is expected to be about 1.8, and the gap distance for the dc field is 10 um. Under the most optimistic assumptions about mode overlap with the active polymer region (that is, assuming complete overlap), this corresponds to a γ of about 0.03 um⁻¹.

It is useful to calculate, given the current r₃₃ values that are available, the index tuning that might be achieved with these designs. The most advanced polymers now yield r₃₃ values of 500 pm/V. If a bulk refractive index of 1.7 is used, then a ∂n/∂V of 0.006 V⁻¹ is obtained with the best design given above. Using a waveguide with an effective index of 2 and a group index of 3, which are typical of silicon-polymer nano-slot waveguides, the V_(p) for a Mach-Zehnder with a length of 1 cm is expected to be about 6 mV. The resonance shift that is expected to be obtained in a ring resonator configuration would be 380 GHz per volt. Both of these values represent orders of magnitude improvement in the performance of these devices compared to current designs.

Segmented Contacting

As we have shown empirically, silicon can be doped to about 0.025 Ω-cm of resistivity with a n-type dopant without substantially increasing losses. Other dopants or perhaps other high index waveguiding materials may have even higher conductivities that can be induced, without significantly degrading optical performance. However, it is known that the conductivity cannot be increased endlessly without impacting optical loss.

This naturally presents a serious challenge for the issue of driving a slot waveguide of any substantial length. Consider a slot waveguide arm of length 1 mm, formed of our optimal design. The capacitor formed by the gap between the two electrodes is about 0.25 pF. The ‘down the arm’ resistance of the structure, however, is 4 MΩ. Therefore, the turn on time of an active waveguide based on this is about 0.1 μS, implying a 10 MHz bandwidth.

A solution to this problem is presented by continuously contacting the waveguide via a segmented waveguide. This comprises contacting the two silicon ridges with a series of silicon anus. Even though the silicon arms destroy the continuous symmetry of the waveguide, for the proper choice of periodicity no loss occurs, and the mode is minimally distorted. This is because a Bloch mode is formed on the discrete lattice periodicity, with no added theoretical loss. Of course the performance of fabricated devices will be different from that of conventional slot waveguides due to fabrication process differences. We have previously demonstrated empirically that continuous electrical contact can be formed for non-slotted waveguide via segmentation with relatively low optical losses.

Here we present a simulation of a particular segmentation geometry for our optimal slot waveguide design, that with 200 nm tall and 300 nm wide arms and a gap of 20 nm. We have found that a segmentation with 40 nm arms, and a periodicity of 100 nm, appears to induce no loss or significant mode distortion in the waveguide. Around 2 um of clearance appears to be needed from the edge of the segmented waveguide to the end of the arms. FIGS. 34A, 34B and 34C show plots of several cross sections of the segmented slot waveguide with a plot of the modal pattern overlaid. For comparison, a cross section of the unsegmented slot waveguide is presented as well. Simulations were also performed to confirm that the index shift formula continued to apply to the segmented slotted waveguide. It was found that the index shift was in approximate agreement with the value predicted for the non-segmented case. Non-segmented modesolvers were used for the rest of the simulations in this work, because simulation of the segmented designs is radically more computationally burdensome than solving for the unsegmented case, as they require solving for the modes of a 3d structure. Since the index shifts for the unsegmented and sedmented cases are extremely similar, solving for the modes in the unsegmented cases is adequate for purposes of design and proof-of-concept.

FIG. 34 A shows a cross section of the segmented, slotted waveguide, with the |E| field plotted in increments of 10% of max value. FIG. 34B shows a similar plot for the unsegmented waveguide. FIG. 34C shows a horizontal cross section of the segmented, slotted waveguide; Re(Ex) is plotted in increments of 20% of max. In an actual device, some sort of metal based transmission line would undoubtedly provide the driving voltage for the waveguide. The metal electrodes that would likely form part of this transmission line have been noted in FIG. 34C. In all cases the mode has been normalized to have 1 Watt of propagating power. FIG. 34A and FIG. 34C show the location of the other respective cross section as a line denoted C in FIG. 34A and A in FIG. 34C.

Assuming a 0.025 Ω-cm resistivity, one can calculate the outer arm resistance as 63 kΩ per side per period, while the inner arm resistance is 25 kΩ per side per period. The gap capacitance per period is 2.5×10⁻¹⁷ Farads. This implies a bandwidth on the order of 200 GHz.

Waveguide Using Crystalline Elecro-Optic Materials

We now describe some waveguide geometries using as an example the crystalline material barium titanate, which is expected to have favorable modulation performance. It should be understood that other perovskites (for example lithium niobate), or other crystalline materials having electro-optic or other non-linear optical properties may be employed in alternative embodiments.

We believe that a silicon or silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafer can be a suitable substrate upon which the barium titanate can be grown. For example, the use of various substrate materials and the preparation of layers of bartium titanate on substrates are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,142,760, 5,225,031, 6,103,008, 6,122,429, 6,204,525, and 6,303,393, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

In one embodiment, the film structure comprises a silicon handle, 3 um of oxide, 120 nm of <100> silicon, with the barium titanate on top of the silicon layer. One may consider where the various optical axes of the barium titanate will lie. Given that the first contemplated embodiment involves in-plane electric fields (parallel to the Si layer), and the electrooptic coefficients r51, r13, r33, one can expect that the x (1), z(3) axes of the barium titanate will lie in the plane of the silicon chip, though other embodiments are possible. Thus, the y axis (2) will lie out of plane.

According to Prof. Amnon Yariv's text entitled Quantum Electronics at page 302, a crystal lattice of barium titanate should have: r13=r23 and both nonzero, r33 nonzero, r42=r51 and both nonzero. The text also reports the various coefficients as: r13=r23=8 pm/V. r33=23 pm/V. r42=r51=820 pm/V. The ordinary and extraordinary indices of refraction of barium titanate are 2.43 and 2.36 respectively. The effective index of the waveguide in question will be determined by the mode overlap with the material in the slot, with the cladding material, and with the silicon, and can be determined using a hermetian eigensolver.

For the purposes of calculating the effect on a guided mode, the dielectric tensor of the nonlinear material, combined with the modal overlap with the material in the slot, provide necessary data. Yariv reports that the relative dielectric constant perpendicular to the crystal axis at low frequencies is 4300. He reports the parallel dielectric constant as 106.

Overview of Design

It is believed that both the modulating electric field and the optical electric field should preferably be at 45 degrees from the 3 axis of the crystal. In order to take maximum advantage of the slot waveguide approach described here, it is important for the both the modulating and optical electric fields to be parallel, and normal to the dielectric material in the slot.

If the crystal axes are oriented as described above, that is only possible by going diagonal in plane. That is, the optical and modulating electric fields should lie in, for example, the x/sqrt(2)+y/sqrt(2) direction.

Optimal Waveguide—Slot Geometry

It is believed that the most optimal design possible is now described. It will provide a useful basis for discussion, and also a useful thing to compare other designs against. For this waveguide, the modulating field will be in the x/sqrt(2)+z/sqrt(2) direction; that is, 45 degrees off the 3 axis.

The index ellipsoid matrix, in the coordinates of the barium titanate crystal, will be:

$\quad\begin{pmatrix} {1/n_{o}^{2}} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & {1/n_{o}^{2}} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & {1/n_{e}^{2}} \end{pmatrix}$

The shift in the index ellipsoid matrix will be:

$\begin{pmatrix} \frac{r\; 13}{\sqrt{2}} & 0 & \frac{r\; 51}{\sqrt{2}} \\ 0 & \frac{r\; 23}{\sqrt{2}} & 0 \\ \frac{r\; 51}{\sqrt{2}} & 0 & \frac{r\; 33}{\sqrt{2}} \end{pmatrix}E_{modulation}$

For calculating the effects of a shift in index ellipsoid on a guided mode, the dielectric tensor is most convenient. To first order the shift is, in the coordinates of the crystal:

${\delta \; ɛ} = {\begin{pmatrix} \frac{r\; 13\; n_{o}^{4}}{\sqrt{2}} & 0 & \frac{r\; 51\; n_{e}^{2}n_{o}^{2}}{\sqrt{2}} \\ 0 & \frac{r\; 23\; n_{o}^{4}}{\sqrt{2}} & 0 \\ \frac{r\; 51\; n_{e}^{2}n_{o}^{2}}{\sqrt{2}} & 0 & \frac{r\; 33\; n_{e}^{4}}{\sqrt{2}} \end{pmatrix}E_{modulation}}$

Let us take the x direction of the waveguide to be in the modulation field direction, the y out of plane, and z the direction of propagation. Then in the coordinates of the waveguide:

${\delta \; ɛ} = {\frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}}\begin{pmatrix} {{r\; 13\; n_{0}^{4}} + {r\; 33\; n_{e}^{4}} + {2\; r\; 51\; n_{e}^{2}n_{o}^{2}}} & 0 & {{{- r}\; 13\; n_{o}^{4}} + {r\; 33\; n_{e}^{4}}} \\ 0 & {{2\; r\; 23\; n_{0}^{4}}\;} & 0 \\ {{{- r}\; 13\; n_{0}^{4}} + {r\; 33\; n_{e}^{4}}} & 0 & \begin{matrix} {{r\; 13\; n_{0}^{4}} + {r\; 33\; n_{e}^{4}} -} \\ {2\; r\; 51\; n_{e}^{2}n_{o}^{2}} \end{matrix} \end{pmatrix}E_{modulation}}$

This nearly reduces to the expression given in the presentation for a similar circumstance (the difference being due to the fact that the shift in epsilon was solved for here rather than the effective r coefficient).

In analyzing the modulation performance, the following expression is useful:

${\delta \; n_{eff}} = {\frac{1}{Z_{0}}\frac{\int{E_{i}^{*}E_{j}\delta \; ɛ_{i,j}{A}}}{2\; {{Re}\left( {{E_{x}^{*}H_{y}} - {E_{y}^{*}H_{x}}} \right)}{A}}}$

which can be written as:

δn _(eff) =S _(i,j)δε_(i,j)

where S is the waveguide mode “susceptibility tensor.” For a plane wave propagating through a uniform medium of index n0 with Ex polarization, the susceptibility tensor is:

$S = \begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{2\; n\; 0} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}$

which is a useful basis for comparison.

Consider the waveguide design: presented in FIG. 35. FIG. 35: Slot waveguide design and mode in contours in |E| for slot waveguide.

In one embodiment, the slot waveguide is formed by a 50 nm thick layer of Si that is etched with a trench, and then filled with barium titanate. Various methods for depositing barium titanate or other crystalline nonlinear optical material may be employed such as sputtering, PECVD, atomic layer deposition (ALD), pulsed laser deposition, MOCVD, MBE, or any combination of the above methods. Two arms of silicon are deposited on the sides. They are 200×150 nm in size. The barium titanate resides in the center, and is 100×200 nm in size. An air cladding has been assumed, but anything with index<1.5 would be acceptable and would provide low loss.

FIG. 36 is an illustration of a dispersion diagram of a slot waveguide. The waveguide is expected to be fabricated by beginning with a wafer, for example an SPI wafer. One etches slots to prepare the slotted waveguide structure, and the one fills the slot or slots using any convenient growth process as specified above.

For the slot waveguide, the susceptibility tensor is a 3×3 matrix-type tensor:

-   (0.0785577,0) (0.000158256,−0.000318457) (−0.000845051,−0.00131509)     (0.000158256,0.000318457) (0.000270648,0) (6.19354e-06,−8.47486e-05)     (−0.000845051,0.00131509) (6.19354e-06,8.47486e-05) (0.000248906,0)

Note the result is real when the tensor product is taken owing to the symmetry of the dielectric tensor. Clearly the (1,1) term of the tensor dominates. Using the Yariv values for the r13, r33, and r51 values, the derivative of effective index with respect to bias voltage is 0.015 1/V. This large value is mainly due to the fact that the electric field in the gap is 1e7 V/m, or 1e5 V/cm for just 1 V of bias. Once this is the case, and the susceptibility of the waveguide mode is not attenuated greatly, if the r51 coefficient is involved this kind of number makes sense. This corresponds to a VpL product of 2.5 mV-cm, which is around 3 orders of magnitude better than what is available at present. Note that a full field and thus index shift is not needed to achieve this value; in fact, one would probably wish to drive the modulator with a small voltage.

An Alternative Waveguide—Horizontal Slot

Now consider a case where the electric field is in the y direction. FIG. 37 illustrates a TM mode of a horizontal slot waveguide. Using the same approach as before, we have for the dielectric tensor shift in the crystal coordinate system:

${\delta \; ɛ} = {\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & {r\; 42\; n_{e}^{2}n_{o}^{2}} \\ 0 & {r\; 42\; n_{o}^{2}n_{e}^{2}} & 0 \end{pmatrix}E_{modulation}}$

The waveguide is formed by a 500×100 nm wide silicon layer with a 500×100 nm barium titanate later, and finally a 500×100 nm side polysilicon layer on top.

An alternative fabrication sequence for vertical structures could comprise the following steps:

Wafer bonding, possibly with “smart cut” (e.g., ion implantation followed by layer removal) to prepare an epitaxial layer liftoff followed by lithography and etching. Epitaxial growth of the relevant layers on top of the silicon wafer is performed. Any of the growth methods previously described for the crystalline electro-optic material can be used as appropriate.

This time a TM mode is used, that is, the E field is primarily directed vertically (normal to the silicon layer). FIG. 38 is an illustration of a dispersion diagram of a waveguide in which the TM0 mode is to be used.

The susceptibility tensor for the TM0 mode is given by a Matrix, (3,3), unit type susceptibility tensor:

-   (6.51985e-05,0) (0.000112777,0.00119932) (4.75197e-05,6.13375e-05)     (0.000112777,−0.00119932) (0.0988065,0) (0.000698201,−0.00960555)     (4.75197e-05,−6.13375e-05) (0.000698201,0.00960555) (0.00249856,0)

Clearly, this is not very compatible with the dielectric shift tensor. There is no rotation around the y axis that gets the 2,2, component to touch the r42 element. The best we can do is to take the z (3) axis of the crystal to be the z axis of the waveguide. In that case, the derivative of the effective index works out to be 3.7e-4 1/V. This is still quite good compared to many materials, though far short of what is possible. This would have a VpL of 0.1 V-cm. This might be worth building solely on the basis of this result.

Possible Avenues of Improvement

One possible way to improve performance is to orient the crystal axis out of the x-y plane. Then, a proper selection of waveguide direction can increase performance greatly. Another approach might involve making the horizontal slot waveguide nonuniform, possibly increasing the mode susceptibility.

Theoretical Discussion Optical Rectification Theory

The general governing equation of nonlinear optics is known to be:

D _(i)ε₀(ε_(r) E _(i)+χ_(ijk) ² E _(j) E _(k)+ . . . )

Our EO polymers are designed to exhibit a relatively strong χ² moment, ranging from 10-100 pm/V. In most χ² EO polymer systems, the Pockel's effect is used to allow the electric field (due to a DC or RF modulation signal) to modify the index of refraction. In such systems the modulating electric field is typically far in excess of the electric field from the optical signal and the term that produces the material birefringence is the only term of importance in the above equation.

Our waveguides, however, have a very large electric field as most of the radiation is confined to a 0.01 square micron cross section. It can be shown that the electric field is approximately uniform in the transverse direction, with a magnitude of

$10^{8}\sqrt{P}\frac{V}{m}$

where P is the optical power in Watts. At large optical fields, the non-Pockels terms involved in the governing nonlinear equation cannot be neglected. For coherent input power, at a given location in the waveguide, the optical field is:

E _(optical)(t)=A cos(wt+θ)

The term

$E_{optical}^{2} = {{\frac{A^{2}}{2}{\cos \left( {2\left( {{wt} + \theta} \right)} \right)}} + \frac{A^{2}}{2}}$

will therefore contain not only frequency doubled components, but also a “DC” component. This phenomenon is known as optical rectification. We believe that this DC component provides a likely explanation for the photo-current that we observe. Because we have positioned electrodes (the two sides of the slot waveguide) at precisely the bounds of the induced field, the effect of optical rectification takes a small slice of the optical power and converts it into a virtual voltage source between the two arms. This in turn induces a current that we can measure and is linearly proportional to the input power E_(optical) ².

Now let us consider the solution to Maxwell's equation in more detail. Our system can be approximated for this discussion as having two dimensions, with both the optical and DC electric field in the x direction and propagation in the z direction, for instance. Let us imagine that the χ² is nonzero and small for a tiny region from 0 to w in the x dimension. χ² is sufficiently small that the electric field due to the optical mode is still uniform. Let us imagine the system has no charge anywhere. The optical electric field can be written as E=Ae^((ikz−iωt))+c.c. where c.c. indicates a complex conjugate. Let us further assume that the rectified DC field is of real amplitude C and uniformly directed in the x dimension on (0, w), and 0 elsewhere.

Other than the divergence condition, Maxwell's equations are still satisfied by this system. But at the edge of an interface on the interior, the DC frequency component of D_(x), the displacement electric field, is discontinuous. At x0, we have:

D_(x) ⁻=0

D _(x) ⁺=ε₀(ε_(r) C+χ ² C ²+2χ² |A| ²)

We neglect χ²C² because we expect the amplitude of the rectified field to be far smaller than that of the optical field. Clearly, the boundary condition of zero divergence can only be satisfied if D_(x) ⁺ is 0. Then,

$C = {{- \frac{2\; \chi^{2}}{ɛ_{r\;}}}{A}^{2}}$

Thus the direction of the rectified field is reversed compared to the direction of χ². Note that there is no particular direction associated with the optical field as it is continually oscillating. As we have seen, this rectified DC field would then, if acting as a virtual voltage source, create an effective positive tenninal on the positive polling terminal.

Analysis of Data for Optical Rectification

To derive the magnitude of the expected photocurrent, we assume that the χ² magnitude relating to the Pockels' effect is similar to that for optical rectification. A measurement of χ² can then be obtained from the direct observation of the electro-optic coefficient by the standard measurements described earlier. The typical measured tuning value of 2 GHz/V yields approximately 50 pm/V.

In the best case, devices with 6 dBm of input power returned approximately 1.4 nA of current. With Qs ranging from 3 k to 5 k, and assuming approximately 7 dB of insertion loss in the input grating coupler on one of our chips, in the best case as much as 0 dBm might be circulating in a resonator on resonance. This implies a peak electric field due to the optical signal of approximately 3.1×10⁶ V/m. The induced static nonlinear polarization field is then nearly 1000 V/m, which amounts to a voltage drop of 14×10⁻⁵ V across a 140 nm gap. If this voltage is assumed to be perfectly maintained, and the load resistance is assumed to be 5 MO, then 28 pA would be generated, about a factor of 100 less than is observed in the largest measurement made, but within a factor of 20 of the typical measurement of 352 pA for 6 dBm of input. Significantly, because the generated current is quadratic in E, it is clear that the current will be linearly proportional to the input intensity. This is in accordance with our observations. The best results for optical rectification were obtained with YLD 124/APC polymer, whereas our best Pockels' Effect results were obtained with the dendrimer materials. It is believed that acceptable performance can be attained for peak electric fields of the order of 1×10⁵ V/m (that is in the range of 1×10⁵ V/m to 9×10⁵ V/m) that are generated due to optical signals. It is further believed that acceptable performance can be attained for peak electric fields of the order of 1×10⁴ V/m (that is in the range of 1×10⁴ V/m to 9×10⁴ V/m) that are generated due to optical signals.

Significantly, the sign of the output current matches that which would be predicted by nonlinear optical rectification, as discussed above. Specifically, since positive current emanates from the positive terminal, the rectified E field has a sign reversed from the χ² and the polling E field. It is well established that the χ² direction tends to align with the direction of the polling E field. Because of this, the rectified field acting as a voltage source will produce an effective positive terminal at the terminal that had the positive polling voltage.

We do not yet fully understand the current generation mechanism. In particular, it is not clear what provides the mechanism for charge transport across the gap. The APC material in which the nonlinear polymer is hosted is insulating, and though it does exhibit the photoconductivity effect due to visible light, it is unclear whether it can for near-infrared radiation. Photoconductivity due to second harmonic generation may play a role in this effect. It is certainly the case, however, that current flows through this gap; that is the only region in the entire system where an electromotive force exists. Also, photoconductivity alone is not adequate to explain the reversal of the current coming from the detector devices when the poling direction is reversed, nor the conversion of the optical input into directed current in general. The only mechanism to our knowledge that adequately explains this data is optical rectification.

If we assume that it will be possible to achieve a 10-fold improvement in the Q's of the resonators, while still getting more than 10 dB of extinction, then the intensity circulating in such a ring would be about 13 dB up from the intensity of the input wave. By comparison, with a Q of about 1000 and high extinction, the peak circulating intensity is about the same as the intensity in the input waveguide. Therefore, it is reasonable to expect that it will be possible to get at least 10 dB of improvement in the circulating intensity, and thus in the conversion efficiency, by fabricating higher Q rings.

By combining the nano-scale slotted waveguide geometry with electro-optical polymers having high nonlinear constants, we have obtained massive enhancement of the optical field. That has in turn enabled us to exploit nonlinear optical processes that are typically only available in the kW regime in the sub-mW regime. This difference is so considerable that we believe it represents a change in kind for the function of nonlinear optical devices. In addition, it is believed that this hybrid material system provides systems and methods for creating compact devices that exploit other nonlinear phenomena on-chip.

Optical rectification based detectors can have many advantages over currently available technology. In particular, such detectors are expected to function at a higher intrinsic rate than the typical photodiode in use, as the optical rectification process occurs at the optical frequency itself, on the order of 100 THz in WDM systems. The absence of an external bias, and the generation of a voltage rather than a change in current flow, both provide certain advantages in electronic operation. We also believe that a device based on nonlinear optical rectification will not suffer from the limitation of a dark current. This in turn can provide WDM systems that will function with lower optical power, providing numerous benefits. Similarly, our demonstration of enhanced modulation using these waveguide geometries provides useful components for future communications systems.

We conclude by stressing advantageous economic aspects of our invention in various embodiments. Because our devices can be fabricated in planar electronics grade silicon-on-insulator, using processes compatible with advanced CMOS processing, it is expected that devices embodying these principles will be less expensive to fabricate.

While the present invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to the structure and methods disclosed herein and as illustrated in the drawings, it is not confined to the details set forth and this invention is intended to cover any modifications and changes as may come within the scope and spirit of the following claims. 

1. An apparatus for manipulating light, comprising: a substrate having an insulating surface; a high index contrast waveguide adjacent said insulating surface; a cladding adjacent said high index contrast waveguide, said cladding comprising a crystalline material that exhibits an enhanced nonlinear optical coefficient; an input port through which an input optical signal is admitted into said apparatus; and an output port from which an output optical signal is provided by said apparatus; said high index contrast waveguide and said cladding configured so that an electric field intensity of at least 10⁵ V/m is generated in a selected one of said high index contrast waveguide and said cladding in response to an input voltage of not more than 1 volt across said high index contrast waveguide.
 2. The apparatus for manipulating light of claim 1, wherein said substrate is a silicon wafer.
 3. The apparatus for manipulating light of claim 2, wherein said insulating surface is a layer comprising silicon and oxygen.
 4. The apparatus for manipulating light of claim 3, wherein said high index contrast waveguide adjacent said insulating surface is silicon.
 5. The apparatus for manipulating light of claim 1, wherein said high index contrast waveguide is a slotted waveguide.
 6. The apparatus for manipulating light of claim 1, wherein said high index contrast waveguide is configured in a closed loop.
 7. The apparatus for manipulating light of claim 1, wherein said high index contrast waveguide is configured as a resonator structure.
 8. The apparatus for manipulating light of claim 1, further comprising an input waveguide for coupling optical radiation into said high index contrast waveguide.
 9. The apparatus for manipulating light of claim 1, further comprising at least one electrical connector for making electrical connection to said high index contrast waveguide.
 10. A method of optically processing light, comprising the steps of: providing a structure comprising: a substrate having an insulating surface, a high index contrast waveguide adjacent said insulating surface, a cladding adjacent said high index contrast waveguide, said cladding comprising a crystalline material that exhibits an enhanced nonlinear optical coefficient, an input port through which an input optical signal is admitted into said apparatus, and an output port from which an output optical signal is provided by said apparatus, said high index contrast waveguide and said cladding configured so that an electric field intensity of at least 10⁵ V/m is generated in a selected one of said high index contrast waveguide and said cladding in response to an input of not more than 1 volt across said high index contrast waveguide; impressing onto said structure an input optical signal to be processed, said input optical signal having at least one parameter characterizing said input optical signal; and observing an output signal, said output signal having at least one parameter that is different from said at least one parameter characterizing said input optical signal.
 11. The method of optically processing light of claim 11, wherein the step of impressing as an input optical signal to be processed includes providing said input optical signal with an input waveguide that communicates with said high index contrast waveguide with a coupler.
 12. The method of optically processing light of claim 11, wherein the step of providing said structure comprises providing a slotted high index contrast waveguide.
 13. The method of optically processing light of claim 11, wherein the step of providing said structure comprises providing a high index contrast waveguide having at least one electrode for applying an electrical signal to said high index contrast waveguide.
 14. The method of optically processing light of claim 11, further comprising the step of applying an electrical signal to said high index contrast waveguide.
 15. The method of optically processing light of claim 16, wherein the step of applying an electrical signal to said high index contrast waveguide comprises applying a signal to pole a cladding material.
 16. The method of optically processing light of claim 11, wherein said output signal having at least one parameter that is different from said at least one parameter characterizing said input optical signal comprises an output optical signal having at least one of one of an intensity, a polarization, a frequency, a wavelength, and a duration that differs from at least one of an intensity, a polarization, a frequency, a wavelength, and a duration of said input optical signal.
 17. The method of optically processing light of claim 11, wherein said output signal has a DC component that is different from said at least one parameter of said input signal.
 18. The method of optically processing light of claim 19, wherein said DC component of said output signal is an electrical signal.
 19. An apparatus for converting an electrical input signal to an optical output signal, comprising: a substrate having an insulating surface; a high index contrast waveguide adjacent said insulating surface, said high index contrast waveguide having input electrodes in electrical communication therewith; a cladding adjacent said high index contrast waveguide, said cladding comprising a crystalline material that exhibits an enhanced nonlinear optical coefficient; an input port through which an input optical signal is admitted into said apparatus; and an output port from which an output optical signal is provided by said apparatus; said high index contrast waveguide and said cladding configured so that a phase shift of substantially p radians in said optical output signal relative to said input optical signal is generated when an electrical input signal having a magnitude measured in hundreds of millivolts is applied to said input electrodes of said apparatus.
 20. The apparatus for converting an electrical input signal to an optical output signal of claim 19, wherein said electrical input signal is an electrical signal having a magnitude measured in tens of millivolts. 